High School Senior Claims First Amendment Violation Over Religious Messages
A high school senior in Colorado Springs has asserted that Rampart High School infringed on her First Amendment rights by prohibiting Christian messages in private parking areas.
Senior Sophia Shoemaker has enlisted the help of the Legal organization First Liberty Institute to formally challenge the school and Academy School District 20. They accuse the school of discrimination based on viewpoint after denying her request to display a Biblical reference in her designated parking space.
The formal complaint states, “Academy School District 20 opened its parking lot as a platform for upperclassmen to express themselves during their senior year.” It argues that since students alter parking spaces, this falls under the protection of the Free Speech Clause. Therefore, the restriction of Shoemaker’s expression based on religious content is considered unlawful.
Interestingly, while upperclassmen at Rampart High are allowed to personalize their parking spots, there are specific limitations on what can be included. According to the district’s policies, messages deemed “offensive, negative, disrespectful, gang-related, political, religious, or trademarked” are not allowed. If a student’s initial design is rejected, they have one chance to revise it; otherwise, the spot can be confiscated.
Shoemaker expressed her desire to paint a scene of a shepherd on a hillside accompanied by a Bible verse. Unfortunately, a supervising teacher declined her request, pointing to school rules. She later sought to modify her design to incorporate “1 Corinthians 13:4” instead, yet was met with hesitation from her teacher, who advised that shortened poems might not be permitted.
First Liberty contends that other schools within the same district permit religious messages and suggests that Rampart’s policy is contradictory. The complaint emphasizes that these messages represent personal expression rather than government speech. Therefore, denying Shoemaker’s right to religious expression amounts to violating the First Amendment.
The complaint’s conclusion urged the school district to retract their denial of Shoemaker’s right to express her beliefs through her parking space and to dismantle what they deem an unconstitutional policy.
In a response to inquiries, Academy District 20 stated they were aware of the legal letter concerning the parking situation. They didn’t delve into specifics regarding potential legal matters or individual cases but confirmed they were examining the information provided.
The district mentioned they had not received any communication from the Shoemaker family regarding this issue, and affirmed that Rampart High’s senior parking program involves content guidelines and a review process by staff.





