Less than two days after an alleged gang rape incident, a woman referred to as Jane Doe was reportedly comforting one of the men she later accused of this crime, expressing that she had no regrets and was “at peace” with the experience, referring to it as a “gang bang” and stating she was “always here to talk about [his regrets,] [be]cause that was a lot.”
Indeed, it was quite a lot.
She went on to tell him, “I really do love u.”
The messages, acquired by TMZ, have been partially reported by other media outlets, including ABC News and the New York Times. However, these sources have not shared the complete texts, which I believe should effectively conclude the allegations of rape.
So, why haven’t these outlets disclosed the full details?
I wonder if they only got snippets of the texts, but that’s hard for me to accept. No responsible news organization would go public without knowing the entire context.
Moreover, given their history of bias, I suspect these news organizations might have chosen to hold back the full texts for political motives. The timing of this story—right before midterm elections and two years post-incident—raises eyebrows. Plus, the mainstream media often seems driven by specific narratives, and this incident certainly aligns with those themes.
It appears the initial text was sent from Jonathan Newell to Jane Doe. Newell is the individual from the Chi Phi fraternity that Jane Doe now accuses of sexual assault. Shockingly, he has already faced expulsion from Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale after being named in Jane Doe’s civil suit, without any formal procedures being followed.
I mention Newell’s race only because there’s a troubling legacy within certain political circles of targeting black males based on unfounded allegations, particularly concerning white women.
In his message the following day, Jonathan wrote, “Hey [redacted] this is Jonathan [redacted] gave me ur number. I just wanted to apologize for how things went down the other night. My memory’s kinda fuzzy abt a lot of it but me and Matt both feel like sl[redacted] for being too f[redacted] up to shut it down and kick people out before it got way out of hand.”
“Matt” is likely referring to Matthew Ingalls, a fraternity brother who was close to Jane Doe and initiated a discussion about a threesome. After being identified publicly, he reportedly left the country for Dubai.
Interestingly, Matt also claimed that Jane Doe took advantage of him during that event, asserting that she assaulted him while he was incapacitated.
Jonathan concluded his message by saying, “You’re an amazing person and I genuinely hope ur not catching as much heat from this as we r. We’ve been shutting down any stories we’ve heard but again I’m so so sorry.”
Jane Doe’s response included some notable points:
aw jonathan i really appreciate this text. my memories super clouded too. i think we were all way to f[redacted] drunk and high…
at the end of the day non of the sexual stuff was illegal and honestly i really liked being w u and matt. so anything anyone has to say about the gamgbang is out of their jurisdiction. i don’t think we should feel any shame for the part. our body our choice asf
In my view, the subsequent text seems to wrap things up:
but if you have any regrets or anything you want to talk about i am always here to talk about it cause that was a lot.
This indicates that Jane Doe seems not just at peace with what transpired, but is also open to discussing any feelings of regret the man might have regarding the incident.
She finishes with a sentiment that leaves me perplexed:
i really do love u and matt and i promise i wont get quiet and weird w u like i did last time
“[L]ast time?”
Last time????
“[L]ove you?”
Love you????
And yet, she is now accusing both men of rape.
Here’s the entirety of her reply:
aw jonathan i really appreciate this text. my memories super clouded too. i think we were all way to f[redacted] drunk and high. i’m getting a little heat (pi phi girls ([redacted] and [redacted]) can’t get my name out of their mouth)) but that’s to be expected. but at the end of the day non of the sexual stuff was illegal and honestly i really liked being w u and matt. so anything anyone has to say about the gamgbang is out of their jurisdiction. i don’t think we should feel any shame for the part. our body our choice asf,,
also yes while it may have been nice for like only 4 people to have been around, yall were both super out of it and they should have taken it on themselves to leave. at the end of the day you, matt, and i were in your bed and they didn’t need to get up in that.
but if you have any regrets or anything you want to talk about i am always here to talk about it cause that was a lot. i really do love u and matt and i promise i wont get quiet and weird w u like i did last time
A few weeks after this, she would assure campus law enforcement that everything was consensual.
Now, two years later, and just ahead of a critical midterm election, she’s alleging rape.
As I’ve mentioned before, I reserve the right to revise my opinions if new information becomes available, and I have altered my perspective. Initially, I thought Jane Doe regretted her involvement in that night’s events and shifted blame to paint it as a gang rape. Now, I believe she might be an opportunist manipulating the situation for her own gain, and she should be held fully responsible for these allegations.
This is not to excuse the appalling actions of the men that night. Everything in this scenario is disturbing, especially with officials like Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) pushing a narrative against the Cornell 7.
