Animal Cruelty Ballot Proposal Moves Forward in Oregon

A new and somewhat contentious ballot initiative related to animal cruelty could create challenges for hunters and fishermen in Oregon.

Officials announced on Wednesday that the bill, titled Initiative Petition 28, is closer to being on the ballot after accumulating 120,000 signatures. This number surpasses the roughly 117,000 required for inclusion in the upcoming November election.

If passed, the initiative would not only outlaw hunting and fishing but also prohibit the slaughter of livestock and the use of animals in rodeo events and scientific research.

Additionally, it seeks to ban commercial poultry farming and the practice of spaying or neutering livestock.

Those advocating for hunting have expressed that the bill misses the mark entirely.

Senator Christine Drazan (R-Canby), a candidate for governor, described it as “an all-out attack on the Oregonian way of life.” She noted that the bill threatens to criminalize ranchers, farmers, and meat producers, jeopardizing thousands of jobs and ending hunting and fishing traditions, which are vital food sources and economic activities.

Farmers added their voices, arguing that the measure would adversely impact local ranchers and hurt the state’s economy. The Oregon Department of Agriculture emphasized on its website that this legislation would expose various stakeholders, from farmers to veterinarians, to criminal liabilities for standard, humane animal care practices.

While some signatures may be rendered invalid—like those from individuals not registered to vote—organizers insist they have until July 2 to submit enough valid ones.

Campaign leader David Michelson shared a hopeful perspective, stating, “There is certainly a chance that we will qualify. We’re collecting signatures daily before the deadline.”

This initiative aims to promote increased plant-based food consumption in Oregon, suggesting that it’s possible to meet the needs of both animals and humans in a way that doesn’t rely on harming animals.

The campaign points out that using animal deaths to fulfill needs is merely a choice, advocating for alternative strategies like investment in plant agriculture and non-lethal wildlife management methods.

Supporters of the initiative say it would allow for specific exceptions, such as for self-defense and veterinary practices. On the other hand, the Oregon Hunter Association, which stands against the proposal, estimates that the ban on hunting, fishing, and farming could affect over a million residents in the state.