As Democrats prepare to take control of the Senate, some members are keeping open the possibility of ending the filibuster. Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts said the option needs to be considered, while Sen. Andy Kim of New Jersey cautioned that changing the rules could have consequences for both parties.
Ending the 60-vote threshold would let a majority pass most legislation more easily. It would also give Republicans the same advantage if they regain control of the chamber.
Asked whether Democrats might change the rules while President Donald Trump is still in office or wait until a possible Democratic presidential win in 2028, Markey said senators were discussing a progressive agenda and he would hear their views on the best approach.
Kim said the potential downsides deserved careful thought. “When you open the door…you gotta be ready,” he said, adding that senators should not rush into decisions on major issues. He suggested Democrats first try to advance legislation through other means and consider what proposals the filibuster might block.
Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, who announced he would challenge Chuck Schumer for Senate majority leader, supports ending the filibuster. He called it “anti-democratic,” arguing that it is not part of the Constitution and gives senators power over the public.
Schumer, a New York Democrat facing criticism from progressives as the party considers its next Senate leadership, did not say whether he would support eliminating the filibuster if Democrats win the White House in 2028.
