Washington State’s New Gun Purchase Requirements
Democrats in Washington are finding ways to complicate and burden the exercise of the Second Amendment, although it’s impossible to completely eliminate it. A recent piece of legislation, which emerged from a Seattle-based Democratic initiative, has gained traction. It passed through the state legislature on party lines and received the nod from Governor Bob Ferguson.
With House Bill 1163 set to take effect on May 1, 2027, residents will face a new requirement when purchasing firearms: obtaining a permit. This so-called “common sense” reform will necessitate potential buyers to secure a five-year permit from the Washington State Patrol.
To obtain this permit, individuals will need to provide various personal details—like their name, email, phone number, address, and even their driver’s license number. Additionally, applicants must submit fingerprints and proof of completion of a certified firearms safety program. I mean, wow, the amount of information they’re asking for is quite extensive.
Of course, navigating this process comes at a price. According to the Washington State Patrol’s Permit to Purchase Portal, the initial fee for a new permit is $126, with renewals costing $90. If a permit expires, the replacement fee is also $126. It’s worth noting that any fees linked to the required training are not included in this total, which is a bit frustrating.
Eligible applicants should expect to wait up to 30 days to receive their permit, and if someone is denied, those fees are non-refundable. Seems a bit harsh, right?
The Washington State Patrol has estimated that this program could exceed $20 million in costs for the 2027-2029 budget period. However, there’s a belief that the fees collected might cover those expenses, according to state fiscal analysis.
After Governor Ferguson’s approval, the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action criticized the permit-to-purchase program, labeling it an illegal registry of gun owners and their personal information. They argued that it would not solve crime issues but instead make legal gun ownership almost out of reach for many people.
Meanwhile, Republican Senator Phil Fortunato pointed out that requiring a permit for a fundamental right is, well, just wrong. He emphasized, “If you have to ask for permission, it’s not a right.” That’s a striking statement that many might resonate with.
Further dissent is echoed by Franklin County Sheriff Jim Raymond, who labeled the program as “insane,” raising concerns about the increased governmental control it implies. He anticipates that legal challenges may follow.
William Kirk, the president of Washington Gun Law, mentioned on a radio show that legal action might not surface until residents are directly affected by the law, saying that organizations supporting the Second Amendment might take action once the law is enforced.
Pierce County Sheriff Keith Swank also voiced his opposition, stating unequivocally that his office would not enforce the new law.

