On Friday’s “CNN Newsnight,” Jean Rossi, who worked for the U.S. Department of Justice from 1989 to 2016 and auxiliary faculty at George Mason University, said Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hanna Dugan “can you tell the victim to show whether it’s reasonable doubt without telling the prosecutor, without telling the victim, or not? That defendant will not be arrested. However, he has never made a case paper and doesn’t think that the case would reach the ju judge or if it were to lead to a conviction.
Rossi said, “All you have here is a judge who is very angry with DEA agents, ice agents and customs.[s] And the border protection deportation officers are hovering like bees for the man they are about to arrest. It’s anger towards steroids. ”
He said, “The prosecutor filed this case in his docket. He had a victim in the audience. For the victim, for the large-scale victim, this was a big deal. And I think this is really a mess, to hide that defendant is being arrested.
Rossi also states that the case adjacent to Dugan “points to trying to block this individual’s arrest and trying to hide this individual’s arrest… As a prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia, I have probably had a lot of illegal immigration cases, whether I wrote this case on paper, or perhaps I have written it on paper. I have something to say this week of the case. [an] The judge’s arrest warrant indicates that they want to make this a spectacle. The last point I want to make is that I indicted – or I presented it to a large ju trial and charged the state prosecutor. I indicted the prosecutor and I didn’t want to make a sight, so I was summoned. They created a scene of this incident. ”
Rossi further predicted that the charges against Dugan would not reach the ju appellate, and if so, “You are going to innocent or negate the ju appellate.” He said the arrest was designed as a distraction.
to follow Ian Hunchet on Twitter @ianhanchett
