Problem: “Hacking” star Hannah Einbinder gave an Emmy acceptance speech on “Free Palestine.”
It’s somewhat ironic that Hannah Einbinder chose to interject her “free Palestine” call during her Emmy acceptance speech, right? Seems a bit out of place, doesn’t it?
It feels stranger than fiction, honestly.
Maybe these “activists” should instead be advocating for Hamas to release the hostages and aim for an end to the conflict altogether.
Sylvia Cane
Brooklyn
In the wake of her speech at the Emmy Awards, one might think Jews would find pride in counting Hannah Einbinder among them, given her attempt to separate Jews from Israel.
I wonder if she sees herself primarily as American, though.
Rather than calling for peace, she seemed to lean into the standard rhetoric from the Awakening Left, putting on a show for her Hollywood peers.
In my opinion, she’s done a disservice to all Jews.
Bo Madden
Jupiter, Florida.
Even though Emmy winner Hannah Einbinder has reached the age of 30, one could argue she doesn’t exhibit the maturity you’d expect.
It’s easy to overlook the hostages still held by Hamas and the ongoing threats from jihad militants, isn’t it?
Interesting to note, Jewish Cespians suggest that Jews should simply treat Israel as a “nationalist state.”
Someone once mentioned to me that the most uncomfortable anti-Semite might just be Jewish.
Seems like Einbinder fits that description.
Charles Winocole
Fall River, Massachusetts.
Before delivering her acceptance speech at the Emmy Awards, Hannah Einbinder could have benefited from recalling what Ricky Gelweiss said during the 2020 Golden Globes.
“If you win tonight, don’t turn it into a chance for political discourse. You’re not in a position to lecture anyone about what’s happening in the real world.”
Peter Bochner
Wayland, MA.
I had plans to watch “The Pitt” on HBO Max, but since “Hacking” Hannah is also on the platform, I’ll skip it entirely to avoid supporting her or HBO.
Frank Cambria
Staten Island
Problem: Russian drones violating Polish airspace lead to Warsaw calling Article 4 of NATO.
Dalibor Rohac is spot on. It’s high time NATO responds to Russian aggressions, and shooting down these drones should be a final warning for Poland.
Interestingly, some of the drones that entered NATO territory weren’t even close to Ukraine.
Vladimir Putin seems to be testing President Trump without any hesitation.
At this stage, most publications appear to be advocating for stronger economic pressure on Russia, asset seizures, and increased military assistance for Ukraine.
With Poland invoking Article 4, it’s clear which article we might see come up next.
Daniel Kuncio
Tribecca
The recent violation of Polish airspace by one of Putin’s drones is a serious issue, amplifying the ongoing quest for peace in the Russian-Ukraine conflict.
Why do cities like Chicago need to be treated with war strategies, while Moscow seems to escape scrutiny?
These drone incursions against frontline NATO allies reflect the current regime’s attitude, reminiscent of the Munich moments from the past.
James Highland
Beachhurst
Want to compare today’s stories? Send your thoughts (including full name and city of residence) to letter@nypost.com. Text will be edited for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
