America First: A Shift in National Security Strategy
Critics once labeled President Donald Trump’s “America First” approach as isolationist. However, national security experts now view it differently, recognizing it as a policy focused on deterrence fortified by alliances, particularly with Israel.
Fred Fleitz, deputy director at the Center for American Security and a former chief of staff on the National Security Council, explains that this strategy emphasizes strong security policies and accountability among allies. He notes that supporting Israel is rooted in strategic interests rather than mere emotion, as Israel confronts threats that could also affect the U.S. if it weren’t present in the region.
Israel as America’s Frontline Defense
Mike Makovsky, CEO of the Jewish Institute for National Security in America (JINSA), shares his view that Israel absorbs threats that might otherwise necessitate U.S. military intervention. He identifies three primary interests in the region: Israel, oil, and combating terrorism. He mentions the irony of the America First debate re-emerging shortly after Israel highlighted threats from Iran and its affiliates, noting the potential danger posed by Iran’s ballistic missiles.
Makovsky emphasizes that Israel’s military operations exemplify the strategic significance of the U.S.-Israel relationship, contending that Israel has significantly weakened Hamas and continues to confront groups like Hezbollah, crucial for U.S. interests in the region.
Countering Iran and Its Allies
Fleitz considers Iran the principal threat, asserting that Iranian proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah could jeopardize stability in the region. He believes Israel’s actions have not only diminished Hamas’s power but have also put pressure on Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
Both analysts see Iran collaborating with Russia and China, exploiting turmoil in the Middle East to diminish U.S. influence. Fleitz notes President Trump’s decisive actions regarding Iran’s nuclear program as evidence of using force to avert greater future conflicts.
Energy and Economic Security
Energy policy plays a vital role in the America First doctrine, as Fleitz suggests that independence from foreign energy supplies can stabilize utility costs for Americans. He also proposes that increased oil production from nations like Saudi Arabia could potentially ease global tensions.
Makovsky agrees, suggesting that without Israel’s efforts to contain Iranian influence, energy markets could face dire consequences. Both experts argue that having Israel manage regional security would save both financial and military resources for the U.S.
Avoiding Unnecessary Wars
Fleitz stresses that Trump’s doctrine isn’t about entirely avoiding military action but about using it judiciously to maintain safety without unwarranted conflict. He reassures that U.S. forces in Israel are not slated for deployment in Gaza, emphasizing a strategy that balances presence with limited engagement.
Credibility and Global Deterrence
Makovsky cautions that scaling back support for Israel would damage U.S. credibility internationally. He recalls a senior Arab leader’s warning that failing to support Israel against Iran could lead to significant fallout. He argues that the close U.S.-Israel relationship reassures other allies, and failing to uphold it could jeopardize relations with them as well.
Peace Through Power
Fleitz highlights Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza as a testament to the strength of the America First concept, aiming for a balance of diplomacy and power. He acknowledges the fragile nature of the ceasefire but emphasizes the success in rescuing hostages from Israel as a primary achievement.
Ultimately, both analysts affirm that “America First” does not equate to isolation. Rather, it’s about cultivating strategic partnerships that reinforce U.S. standing while avoiding prolonged military engagements.
