The US International Development Agency makes headlines for waste, fraud and abuse. These issues are realistic, but not coincidental. The agency is working as intended.
USAID was intentionally designed both home and internationally, pouring billions of taxpayer dollars into non-governmental organizations. Some of these funds would benefit Hamas, Gaza through intermediaries, while other grants supported media organizations that promote narratives in favour of those in power.
If Americans are serious about regaining government, they must also be serious about defining what should replace these failed institutions.
This created a closed propaganda loop. Not only did the USAID promote change of administration overseas, it also promoted misinformation at home, giving misleading reports to American citizens and members of Congress. The agency served a dual purpose. It strengthens our influence while strategically weakening our enemies. It became an American relic that prioritized economic benefits over democratic ideals.
The real problem is that USAID is not only plagued by corruption. The deeper problem is that for decades the post-World War II global order relied on USAID as a tool for American hegemony.
When we properly tear the organs of life in that system, our focus should be on what our government and our place in the world appear to be on the other side.
USAID is just an example. Many US institutions are not only inefficient and bureaucratic, but also outdated institutions that probably should never exist. Forensic audits have been delayed for a long time. We must investigate what was done, learn from it, and discard many of these institutions as historical artefacts. This is not just a reform, but a positive dismantling of the post-World War II global order.
If Americans are serious about regaining government, they must also be serious about defining what should replace these failed institutions. The arguments that focus on maintaining economic strength and strategic stability in a world where we no longer pull strings, lack real opportunities and real points.
This argument should be based on truth and first principles. But how many Americans can clarify the fundamental truths in which this country was established? Do you even have the time for the citizen lessons you desperately need?
Serious questions require serious answers, but they are ignored in favor of a brief discussion of “fraud” and “inefficient.” It's easy to get mad at wasted taxes, and that anger can serve as a catalyst for greater recognition. But if people really want a say, they need to move faster. No one stops time, and nature hates vacuum.
Donald Trump was elected on an order to return power to people. He is doing his part. Are we ready to do our thing?
Instead of sticking to outdated statecraft, America should grab this moment for an update. Supporting a broken system will only delay the inevitable. The real challenge is to build a future rooted in the perception that freedom, decentralization, and power belongs to people as sovereigns.
The first step is to understand how the world operates and to acknowledge that its control through secret manipulation and economic coercion is unsustainable. You have reached the end of that path. If America continues to be a leader, it needs to redefine strength not as a global micromanagement, but as an unwavering commitment to self-sufficiency, resilience and its people's freedom.
yes, Our people. America must first be rebuilt at home. This means investing in domestic industries and decentralizing electricity rather than relying on financial engineering, rather than promoting innovation.
We must embrace a future where impacts can be achieved through excellence, not imposed through foreign aid and intervention.
USAID is just the tip of the iceberg. The efficiency of President Trump and the government lies in a direct conflict course with the entrenched power structure of Uniparts. They are ready for a fight. Are you us? The dissolution of American hegemony must be accompanied by a new commitment to citizen engagement based on truth and first principles.
