The former chairman of the now-disbanded Jan. 6 Committee introduced a bill Friday that would strip Secret Service protections for former executives convicted of felonies. This is an effort to avoid the complications of incarceration if former President Trump were ordered to serve a prison term. .
It’s called “The Denial of Unlimited Security and Government Resources to Convicted and Highly Disgraced Former Guardians.” law Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi) has proposed ending lifetime protections for former presidents if they are convicted of a felony and sentenced to more than a year in prison. .
“Unfortunately, current law does not anticipate how Secret Service protections will affect a protected person, or even a former president’s felony sentence,” Thompson said in a statement.
“While it is unfortunate that this has happened, this previously unthinkable scenario could become a reality. And we need to be prepared to change the law to ensure that those sentenced to prison serve the required period of time.”
The move was aimed at protecting the Secret Service, and some legal officials believe that given President Trump’s 24-hour protection, if ultimately convicted, he could face prison time. It has been suggested that there is a strong possibility that he will be given some form of home confinement rather than a sentence.
“This bill removes the potential for conflicting lines of power within prisons and allows judges to consider individual sentencing without considering the logistical concerns of inmates receiving Secret Service protection.” , Thompson’s team wrote in the bill’s brief. .
Secret Service protection is given not only to current and former presidents, but also to other senior officials and close relatives of protected persons.
But Trump is the only ward facing felony charges, facing 91 different felonies in four different state and federal cases.
Trump is currently participating in a hush money trial in a New York courtroom and is facing charges related to the Jan. 6 incident in federal courts in Washington and Georgia. His federal documents case is being overseen in Florida.
Thompson also cited case law that says the government can take away benefits unless the change is found to have an “unlawful and punitive purpose,” and said the bill would address ex post concerns (the law would be applied retroactively). The company claims that it does not cause any concerns that would arise if the
Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
