Halle Berry Critiques Gavin Newsom’s Stance on Menopause Legislation
Halle Berry recently voiced her criticism of California Governor Gavin Newsom during The New York Times’ Dealbook Summit. She specifically addressed his lack of support for the Menopause Care Fairness Act, highlighting his veto of related legislation.
“By neglecting half the population, namely women, and dismissing us during midlife, I don’t think he should be our next president,” she remarked.
Berry also pointed out that if a man were experiencing a medical issue impacting his sleep, cognitive abilities, and sexual health, it would immediately be deemed a significant health crisis, perhaps even comparable to a pandemic.
“When women are quietly suffering through perimenopause and menopause, trying to maintain their families, careers, and relationships, it doesn’t just affect them—it impacts every family around them,” she stated.
She emphasized, “It influences workplaces and the economy. In fact, one in six women leaves their job because of menopausal symptoms, which has broader implications for everyone.” Berry called for both men and women to engage in this important issue.
“I need every woman in this country to join me in this fight,” she urged. “But honestly, this effort isn’t just for us women. We need men involved as well. We need our leaders, every person in this room. We want you all to remain inquisitive. Ask questions, even if the topic feels uncomfortable or strange—take an interest.”
As reported by Variety, the proposed bill aimed to ensure comprehensive insurance coverage for necessary menopausal treatments, mandated ongoing education for physicians regarding menopause, and instructed the Board of Health to create a relevant curriculum.
When Newsom vetoed the measure in October, he explained that the bill would restrict health plans’ ability to provide adequate care while minimizing unnecessary expenses.
He remarked, “As I’ve advocated for more tailored solutions, this bill still doesn’t meet that criterion. The sweeping coverage demanded by the bill, along with the proposed limits, is too broad.”
