SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Harvard’s stonewalling proves it still doesn’t care about antisemitism on campus

Harvard University is still They failed Jewish students.

The House Education and Labor Committee was forced to subpoena Harvard University executives, including Penny Pritzker, a senior Harvard fellow, and Dr. Alan Garber, interim president. The school ignored Wednesday’s deadline to submit documents regarding its response to anti-Semitism on campus.

The committee initially requested documents on January 9, including internal communications and meeting minutes related to anti-Semitism and the war between Israel and Gaza.

What is the university’s response?

“After reasonable investigation and consideration, to date Harvard University has not identified any meeting minutes relevant to the committee’s request.”

Representative Virginia Foxx, the committee’s charwoman, pointed out this outrageousness, saying, “The Oversight Committee and the Harvard University Management Corporation have shown that the protections for Jewish students at Harvard are so petty that “It would be shocking if you thought that this topic was not worth discussing in one meeting.”

By late January, the university had submitted a series of documents, including more than 1,000 pages. It has been published Congressman Foxx called it “woefully inadequate.”

Harvard University was then given a final warning to comply fully with the committee’s demands and provide “priority documentation.” That too was blown away.

The university’s indifference and obstruction prove that administrators are unwilling to take seriously the scourge of anti-Semitism on campus, and there is plenty of evidence that they never did.

During her testimony before the committee, then-President Claudine Gay did not even confirm that calling for the genocide of Jews violated the university’s code of conduct, stating that the university supported “free speech.” He hid in the shadow of what was said to be the case.

At the same time, Harvard University also emphasizes that: Using objectionable pronouns is “abuse” and constitutes harassment.

In fact, the school has repeatedly demonstrated its indifference to Jewish hatred. First, the failure to adequately address allegations of harassment of Jews on campus in the wake of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel, and second, the refusal to fire gay after gay. By. Her disastrous appearance before the committee on December 5th (she only resigned after mounting plagiarism allegations forced her to resign).

It also appointed a professor accused of anti-Semitism to head an anti-Semitism committee. Now it’s dragging its feet on obeying Congress.

Harvard University has its priorities clear. Jewish students are not on the list.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News