SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

House approves $70 billion immigration bill, forwards it to Trump

House approves $70 billion immigration bill, forwards it to Trump

House Passes Immigration and Border Security Bill

The House of Representatives voted on Tuesday to approve the Republican Party’s comprehensive immigration and border security policies, resolving a lengthy dispute with Democrats regarding funding for President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement agenda.

The immigration enforcement bill, amounting to $70 billion, passed narrowly with a 214-212 vote. Democrats opposed it unanimously, with Rep. Kevin Kiley, an independent from California who caucuses with Republicans, also voting against the measure.

Meanwhile, every Republican present supported a Senate-approved bill that would secure funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) until the fiscal year 2029.

This vote represents a significant triumph for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), potentially protecting him from losing any members in the fragile Republican majority.

The bill, titled the “Safe America Act,” is now awaiting President Trump’s signature. It allocates $38 billion for ICE and $26 billion for Border Patrol, along with a $5 billion fund managed by Homeland Security Secretary Mark Wayne Mullin.

Kiley, who recently registered as an independent, expressed his opposition, arguing that the bill lacks necessary reforms for immigration enforcement and sidesteps traditional funding processes that typically require some consensus from Democrats.

“I find it deeply concerning that we’re undermining one of our foundational processes—an annual bipartisan spending approach—by allowing circumvention when bipartisan agreement can’t be achieved,” he remarked to reporters.

He added that his decision to become an independent stemmed from his belief that extreme partisanship is damaging the country.

Republican leaders countered that Democrats have consistently stalled the Homeland Security budget, necessitating the use of a partisan budget reconciliation process. This approach enabled them to pass the bill with a simple majority in the Senate.

House Minority Leader Steve Scalise (R-Louisiana) stated, “Democrats in Washington clearly favor reverting to open borders. We’re not going back to that.”

For months, Democratic lawmakers have resisted funding for ICE and Border Patrol unless it comes with significant policy reforms. Their heavy-handed tactics contributed to the longest government shutdown in history, which only ended when Trump signed a partial DHS bill in April.

Initially, leading Democrats adopted a tough stance on ICE funding after two Americans were killed during a federal law enforcement crackdown in Minneapolis. Their position remained largely unchanged leading up to Tuesday’s vote.

House Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) criticized the funding bill, claiming, “Republicans are reallocating taxpayer money to agencies that harm communities and even murder citizens. Where’s the common sense in granting this agency unlimited funding without any reforms?”

While Republicans mostly stood united on the funding issue, some more conservative members argued that funding should come alongside reforms reflecting the president’s executive orders.

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) were among those who withheld support for the bill during an early procedural vote. Johnson assured conservative members that he would put the border security bill to a vote in the coming weeks, and some groups are in favor of moving this forward, based on insider discussions.

This budget reconciliation bill’s approval followed Republicans’ failure to meet a June 1 deadline for submitting a budget proposal set by Trump. That timeline became complicated as there was pushback from Republican caucuses in both chambers against Trump’s nearly $2 billion anti-weaponization fund. Recently, some Republicans, including moderate Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pennsylvania), have suggested legislation to rein in the president’s ability to create that fund.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News