Shortly after the tragedy of the Potomac River in January, most people expect Donald Trump to point to one perpetrator Dei policy, the first deadly US disaster since September 11th. Maybe there wasn't. But as a reporter for the Guardian US Lauren Aratani Explanation, Trump's comments, are just the latest chapters in a long battle with diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.
Lauren says Helen Pido DEI policies were born in the 1960s as part of an effort by employers to address fraud and exclusion widely. Today, they are based on actively considering a person's identity (racial, gender, sexuality, disability, class, etc.) while interacting with them, and emerged after the murder of George Floyd in 2020. They have undoubtedly reached their peak in the gusts of corporate announcements.
However, as Lauren explains, conservative opposition to Day has grown for decades, and instead “color vision abnormalities” to what is considered “anti-sided-related reverse identification.” “It claims.” The backlash was led by activists such as Edward Blum to successfully pursue legal challenges for positive action policies during university entrance, and to further expand the growth of the cultural movement, which has increasingly denounced the US issues regarding the promotion of diversity. It's done.
Lauren explores whether the second Trump presidency ultimately means the end of Day, and whether it implies that particular approach to equality and fairness.
