Donald Trump's vow to dismantle “misinformation” researchers, media blacklists like NewsGuard, and the Big Tech censorship cartel has sent shivers through an academic community devoted to censoring conservatives.
of financial times report Since Donald Trump's election victory, researchers and academics who study allegations of digital “misinformation” say they have grown concerned that the new administration will follow through on campaign threats to crack down on their work. . President Trump said during the campaign that he would seek to curtail federal funding to universities found to have engaged in censorship efforts, such as flagging conservative social media content for deletion.
The seriousness of President Trump's intentions is underlined by his selection of Republican FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr, a vocal critic of Big Tech censorship, as chairman. Trump's anti-censorship campaign has garnered public support from Silicon Valley luminaries such as venture capitalist Marc Andreessen and Twitter owner Elon Musk.
“It's just going to be a tsunami of criticism and witch hunts,” warned Megan Squire, deputy director of data analysis at the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center. “I suspect that some people in academia who can choose their own research may self-censor their research, soften it, or change the field of application.”
Some misinformation researchers worry that their jobs and research funding could be at risk if Trump follows through on his threats. “It's scary as hell,” said a professor who studies the field, speaking anonymously for fear of retaliation. “If this happened, I would get on a plane.” [out of America]”
Trump and his allies like Musk say the disinformation field allows governments, academia, blacklisting organizations like NewsGuard and tech companies to collude to suppress conservative speech in the name of fighting fake news. He claims that it has become so. Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen argued in .
President Trump has also suggested amending Section 230, the law that protects internet platforms from liability for user content, to “take platforms out of the censorship business.” Tech companies resisted efforts to weaken the law during President Trump's first term, but some experts say Trump now has more time and allies to get the bill through. I believe the relevant personnel are in place.
At the same time, the platforms themselves seem to want to avoid political barrage over online information, placing less emphasis on online information than they did in the 2020 election, and keeping the issue low profile. There is. But researchers say that even if companies back down, Trump's threat alone could pressure universities, funders and individual academics to self-censor their efforts to combat digital falsehoods. I am concerned that there is.
“It's an existential threat to my livelihood, [our] We need research funding,” said another anonymous misinformation researcher. Despite concerns, experts argue that studying the online information ecosystem remains important at a time when foreign adversaries continue to launch influence operations targeting the United States. But with the Trump administration drawing attention to both researchers and tech companies, the field's future suddenly looks far more uncertain.
read more of financial times here.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News, covering free speech and online censorship issues.
