Twitter co-founder and a free speech failure Jack Dorsey took X to X on Friday. High-tech Road wants to ease copyright and intellectual property laws in favor of AI systems that vacuum human work.
“Please remove all IP laws,” Dorsey wrote in X-Post Friday, sparking debate over intellectual property, patents and copyright.
“I agree,” Musk replied.
Others took me to the comments section to discuss the former Twitter CEO along with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s 2024 running mate Nicole Shanahan write“The real IP professionals here – no. IP law is the only thing that separates human creation from AI creation. If you want to reform it, let’s talk!”
“Creativity is what is currently separating us, and the current system limits it, investing payments in the hands of gatekeepers who are not paying fairly,” Dorsey said. I answered.
Shanahan I responded“ClearAccessip is designed to be an IP clearing house in the age of AI. Coasean principle of low transaction costs and balanced rights of mobility.
“Sadly, in 2020, I was busy finding the cause of ASD in my child and sold the company. Otherwise I would have continued with the company,” she added.
“If there’s no way to monetize, what motive would be created? This is straight from the CCP Playbook,” another X user I wrote itWhich dorsey I answered“Execution and speed are even more important.”
“Next, find another way. Being a CCP doesn’t beat CCP,” says X user. Rebuttal.
“People who never created art said, how to run a book at speed, how to monetize it, someone steals your work for a few months and put it online for free?” I said In response to Dorsey.
“It’s only important if ‘running and speed’ is playing fair.” It rang. “China’s overall strategy is to put risks on others, spend billions of dollars on R&D, copy innovation and outscale it with cheap labor and large subsidies. It’s exploitation, not innovation.”
“If you kill monetization through weak IP laws, you kill the incentives you create,” X user added. “If it’s just cloned by a state-backed giant that didn’t take a risk, why would anyone build the next breakthrough? It’s not a free market. That’s what CCP playbook does.”
“People with more money can take advantage of execution and speed. Instead of buying from someone ready to sell for free.” I commented. “If you’re smart (I have no doubt), why not come up with a mechanism to share profits?”
Another X user I wrote it“I argue that IP laws protect them meaningfully enough to justify the fact that they create large, omnipotent legions. If an individual person fails to protect the rights of the invention and product, the legions will quickly replicate it and crush the little man.”
“Times have changed” and Dorsett Discussed. “One person can build faster. Speed and execution are more important.”
County Highway Editor – Large Walter Kiln opiniontells Dorsey, “Because you’re not a writer, it’s easy to ask for legalized, free plagiarism.”
“This is a scary take,” Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovsky Added. “The IP of a creator must be protected. Big Tech wants to steal content for AI purposes. Creators put in great effort, created the work from the work, and you proposed to destroy that world.”
It remains unknown how it affected Dorsey’s initial statement, but it arrived within an artificial intelligence company facing several lawsuits claiming it was violating copyright in order to train AI models.
Alana Mastrangelo is a reporter for Breitbart News. You can follow her Facebook and x at @armestrangeloand on Instagram.
