SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Johnson, Biden risk blowback from all sides on government funding deal

President Biden and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) are at risk of political backlash from the left and right over the six-bill spending package that lawmakers are rushing to pass before Saturday’s government shutdown. .

Congressional aides were still putting the final touches on the deal by Tuesday afternoon, but lawmakers expected the bill to be released soon and expected to face criticism from both sides of the political spectrum. He said there was.

The bill faces opposition in both chambers of Congress, potentially making it difficult to get it to President Biden’s desk by Friday at 11:59 p.m., when funding for most of the federal government expires.

White House officials take over the final stages of negotiations with Johnson, leaving some Senate Democrats unhappy with the last-minute U-turn and resulting deal to provide more funding for beds and detention facilities on the southern border I held

The deal includes cuts to federal funding for nongovernmental organizations that provide transportation and food stamps to migrants seeking asylum, officials said. This concession to House Republicans won’t sit well with immigration advocates on the left.

A second person familiar with the behind-the-scenes negotiations said the White House is seeking a bipartisan deal with Johnson to work on border security after a deal struck last month with Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) collapsed. He said he wanted to have some control over the agreement. .

The proposal, approved by the National Border Patrol Council, would increase the total number of beds in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities to a total of 50,000 beds.

The Department of Homeland Security faced the prospect of having to shift funding to ICE from other important priorities to address a shortfall of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Immigration advocates in the Senate and around the Capitol opposed the plan to expand detention facilities when the White House approved it last month.

Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) slammed the proposal last month, calling it “another version of the failed Trump-era immigration policies that will cause further chaos at the border.”

At the time, Sen. Bob Menendez (D.N.J.) called it “an enforcement wish list from the Trump administration.”

Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Senate’s leading voice on immigration, said Tuesday he wanted to scrutinize the details of the deal before commenting on concessions to Republicans.

“I’d like to see the whole package,” he said.

“You may not like some of this, you may like some of it,” he added.

Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vermont) praised Biden’s direct involvement in negotiations and argued that the president needs to show leadership in addressing what he called the “border issue.” .

“It’s good to see the president demonstrate his commitment to securing our borders.”

Asked about the criticism Biden might receive from liberals, Welch said: We need to control our borders, and we also need legal immigration. ”

Biden will face criticism from the left, but Johnson wants to add border security legislation, a core element of HR2 that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York dismissed as non-candidate. It will be attacked by conservatives. .

Mr Johnson has already faced criticism. Members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus are trying to rally their colleagues against the spending plan, warning that it would fund Biden’s border policies.

Representative Scott Perry (R-Pennsylvania), a member of the Freedom Caucus, expressed frustration with the spending package, which did not include border reform.

He said it was more than 313 days ago that the House sent a border security proposal to the Senate, but “yet this week the House will directly fund the disastrous open border policy that HR2 was supposed to repeal. “We will consider the bill,” he said.

Forty-three House Republicans, including Perry, announced this week that funding the Department of Homeland Security without policy changes would actively fund what they called “Biden’s ‘open borders’ policy.” It circulated a “Dear Colleague” letter warning that

A person familiar with negotiations between the White House and the House speaker said they focused primarily on funding issues, rather than adding on key policy riders that Democrats had already declared a dead start.

“The House and Senate committees have begun drafting the text of the bill, which will be ready for presentation and consideration by the full House and Senate as soon as practicable,” Johnson wrote on social media Tuesday morning.

The secrecy surrounding the details of the spending plan has fueled opposition from conservatives in the House and Senate who say it does not do enough to limit federal spending or strengthen border security.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) warned on social media that Johnson “will soon announce a huge spending deal to keep the government funded after Friday.”

“It’s going to be full of corrupt features. It’s not going to force Biden into border security. It’s going to continue to be a huge deficit. It doesn’t have to be this way. It’s all about voting ‘no!’ “It starts with,” he declared.

House and Senate leaders face a daunting obstacle course as they rush to pass a huge funding bill by Friday’s deadline.

House rules require bills to be made public for at least 72 hours before lawmakers vote on them, giving them enough time to read and understand their contents.

Unless Johnson abandons the 72-hour rule, the House of Commons vote could be delayed until Friday or Saturday, depending on when the document is published.

The bill is also expected to face opposition from Senate conservatives who want an opportunity to introduce amendments, and final passage of the first part of the funding bill was delayed until hours before the deadline to avoid a partial shutdown. Ta.

But Senate Republican Leader John Thune (S.D.) disputed Democrats’ claims that House Republicans could not govern, saying the speaker would be able to claim credit for provisions in the bill to improve border security. Ta.

“If they can get the Homeland Bill together with some of the provisions in it and get it across the finish line… that’s what makes it possible.”[s] “I give him credit for some of the things that are in there,” he said.

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News