House Speaker Mike Johnson is pushing back against White House claims that Republicans have a “history of opposing border security” and are seeking to reduce the number of Border Patrol agents, but Johnson has criticized historic immigration. While dealing with the matter, he dismissed it as a “hopeless” claim. Crisis at the Southern Border.
“Since the beginning of President Biden’s term, House Republicans have voted to significantly increase funding for Border Patrol and ICE year over year, beyond what the administration requested; “has implemented policies that have undermined national security and created a humanitarian crisis on our southern border,” a memo from Prime Minister Johnson's office said.
“Now, in a desperate attempt to shift the blame for the crisis their policies have caused, they are claiming that it is a matter of funding. Clearly, there are no facts to support their claims,” the paper said. Stated.
Former Department of Homeland Security officials back Johnson's aggressive stance on the border in funding fight, say Republicans need 'clear commitment'
The White House reiterated its claim this week that Republicans voted to remove more than 2,000 Border Patrol agents and undermine the federal government's ability to seize fentanyl.
U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson speaks with Republican lawmakers on Wednesday, January 3, 2024 in Eagle Pass, Texas.
“Actions speak louder than words. House Republicans' track record on border security includes attempting to reduce Customs and Border Protection staffing, opposing President Biden's record-breaking border security funding, and refusing to accept the president's request for additional funding.” It is clear that this has happened,” the spokesperson said. Andrew Bates said.
The 2,000 CBP cut is based on an Office of Management and Budget analysis of last year's Republican budget plan that found funding cuts would lead to staffing cuts, as proposed.
The White House also accused House Republicans of failing to work with the Senate and administration to secure an agreement on additional funding deals for Ukraine, Israel and border assistance. The White House requested $14 billion for border improvements as part of his proposal.
Johnson talks about meeting with Biden on border crisis
“Biden's proposed funding would hire thousands of new Border Patrol agents, hire more asylum and immigration officials, and provide additional subsidies to communities hosting immigrants,” Bates said. , to invest in cutting-edge technology essential to stopping deadly fentanyl from entering our country.” He said.
“On Day One, President Biden proposed a comprehensive immigration reform plan and then delivered record border security funding every year of his term. “I have voted against security funding. Border security is being done in the name of extreme partisan demands.”
Those claims were echoed this week by White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who accused Republicans of pulling a “political stunt.”

Migrants line up after being detained by U.S. immigration authorities at the U.S. border wall, seen from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, Wednesday, Dec. 27, 2023. (AP Photo/Christian Chavez)
But Johnson's office called the claims about cuts “bordering on speculation” and pointed to fact checks that rated CBP's claims about cuts as false or mostly false, including PolitiFact, which cited the action. . Don't make it explicit He said the cuts would be made in the manner described by the White House.
Instead, Prime Minister Johnson's office pointed to a spending bill that would increase funding for border security, saying it would “fund the highest level of Border Patrol agents ever and increase ICE funding at a level greater than ever appropriated.” “This includes storage operations.”
“Funding for Border Patrol operations and related Southwest Border requirements has increased by more than $2.28 billion, or 47%, since FY21.Funding for similar ICE operations has also increased by $860 million, and FY23 “Congress rejected the President's requested cuts to ICE funding in the fiscal year, resulting in significant reductions in detention capacity and overall immigration operations,” the memo states.
Migration negotiations between the U.S. and Mexico also included the benefit of “controlling” illegal immigrants living in the U.S.
Meanwhile, the group said that of its $14 billion funding request, most of it would go toward administration and processing, with $3 billion going to donations to nongovernmental organizations and cash assistance to migrants rather than border operations. They claim that only 17% of them are used for border operations. border guard.
“The President's supplemental request is nothing more than misdirection and false propaganda that will do little to ensure border security,” the memo said.
After Johnson's memo, Bates doubled down in response, saying that Johnson's memo “highlights House Republicans' actions to remove 2,000 Border Patrol agents and weaken fentanyl enforcement to ensure that we “This proves that he was nervous,” he said.
He argued that the U.S. Default Act would have forced the cuts he described, pointing to Johnson's comments that “we will deliver the largest spending cuts in history” and that some Republicans have said that the D.H.S. He pointed to a similar proposal to completely cut off funding to . .
“While Speaker Johnson and House Republicans left Washington for an early vacation in mid-December, President Biden and senators from both parties continued to work to find common ground,” he said. Stated. “The President is focused on securing the resources he requested in the National Security Supplement to secure our borders, including more Border Patrol agents, asylum officers, immigration agents, and fentanyl capture technology.”
Talks are still ongoing between negotiators and the administration, with Republicans pushing for further restrictions on asylum and parole to allow inland migration.
Prime Minister Johnson visited the southern border this week with more than 60 Republican members of Congress to strengthen the credible fear standard for HR2, the House Republican border security bill passed last year that includes release restrictions, and to encourage “Remain in Mexico.” He said he would re-establish it. ” policy and restarting wall construction, among other things, are “necessary elements.”
“Because there are provisions that address each of these issues, and they work together,” he said.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
senate democrats We have ruled out HR 2 and similar proposals as potential starters. Even some of the Biden administration's reported concessions, such as the creation of Title 42-style expungement powers, have faced ire from some liberal Democrats.
The administration also said negotiations are moving forward.
“Negotiations with the Senate continued over the holidays and we continue to be encouraged by continued progress. We are not there yet, but we believe we are moving in the right direction,” a senior administration official said. Ta. reporters on tuesday.



