SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Ohio judge could rule near-ban on all abortions as early as Monday

COLUMBUS, Ohio — A county judge could rule on an Ohio law banning virtually all abortions as early as Monday, considering voters’ decision to enshrine reproductive rights in the state constitution. I will do it.

A 2019 law being considered by Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Christian Jenkins would ban most abortions if heart activity is detected, leaving many women without knowing it after six weeks of pregnancy. It may happen.

Abortion clinic groups tried to overturn the law even before voters approved Issue 1, which gives every Ohioan “the right to make and exercise their own reproductive decisions.”


Ohio voters enshrined reproductive rights into the state constitution. AP

Ohio’s Republican Attorney General Dave Yost acknowledged in a court filing that the 2023 amendment made the ban unconstitutional, but that other elements of the ban, including certain notification and reporting provisions. trying to maintain.

Ohio will be the only state to consider a statewide abortion rights issue in 2023, when the U.S. Supreme Court overturns nationwide protections afforded by the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. Since then, voters have joined many states in choosing to protect access to abortion.

In addition to Jenkins’ case, several other abortion regulations in Ohio are being challenged.

These include banning the use of telemedicine for medication abortions, requiring fetal remains from surgical abortions to be cremated or buried, requiring 24-hour waiting periods, and requiring abortion clinics to establish emergency transportation arrangements with local hospitals. This includes the obligation to maintain.

Such agreements may not be obtainable in some cases due to relevant laws.


Reproductive Freedom Amendment 1 supporters hold placards during a rally at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus, Ohio.
A 2019 law being considered by Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Christian Jenkins would ban most abortions if heart activity is detected. AP

Ohio’s ban on abortions based on a Down syndrome diagnosis remains in effect following a 2021 federal court ruling.

Minority Democrats proposed House measures outside of court to bring state law into compliance with the new amendments.

Their bill, a dud for Ohio’s Republican supermajority, would repeal the cardiac ban. Prohibition of dilation and aspiration, which are common procedures for second-trimester abortions. Requires a 24-hour waiting period. Requirements for transfer agreements; other targeted restrictions on abortion providers.

So far, Ohio’s parental consent law has not been challenged in court or targeted by Democrats, but the anti-abortion movement Protect Women Ohio campaign says the bill is the first This suggests that the bill may be sacrificed if it passes.

Nor have any lawsuits been filed challenging Ohio’s ban on dilation and excision surgery, which was once performed late in pregnancy.

Yost opined during the voter amendment campaign that Issue 1 would open the door to permitting, even though the process is prohibited at the federal level.

The so-called “heartbeat bill” originated in Ohio and has since spread across the United States. But it took him 10 years for the policy to become law in the state.

Then-Republican Governor John Kasich twice vetoed the bill, arguing that it was unlikely to pass a constitutional convention at a time when Roe v. Wade was still the law.

The legislation reached Republican Gov. Mike DeWine’s desk and comes as justices appointed by former President Donald Trump solidify the Supreme Court’s conservative majority, leading to concerns among abortion opponents that the restrictions will ultimately end. The governor signed the bill amid high hopes that its implementation would be successful.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News