Perez Hilton and Tomi Lahren Discuss Cancel Culture
Perez Hilton recently appeared on Tomi Lahren’s show, “Tomi Lahren is Fearless,” where they had a candid discussion about fame, cancel culture, and personal evolution. Hilton, once one of the internet’s most controversial gossip bloggers, shared his thoughts on how controversy can attract attention and the toll it can take. He also talked about what makes some personalities more susceptible to cancellation than others.
During the conversation, they found common ground in their critique of the digital mob mentality, which they believe prioritizes destruction over accountability. Lahren reflected on how the current landscape has shifted dramatically, observing that past PR crises have been replaced by a culture ready to pounce on even the smallest missteps.
“Cancel culture is atrocious today,” she stated, highlighting that some individuals are still sidelined in their careers due to minor mistakes, with online voices calling for drastic penalties like financial ruin or even suggesting extreme actions.
She mentioned that her thoughts on cancel culture extend even towards her detractors. “I don’t believe in cancel culture unless it involves violence,” she noted, pointing out the distinct shift in societal reactions over the years.
Hilton echoed her sentiments, mentioning a saying by Nick Cannon that resonates with him: “Don’t cancel culture, but advise culture.” However, he emphasized that this viewpoint assumes that people have genuine intentions.
Moreover, Hilton remarked that many recent cancellations seem less about social justice and more akin to a twisted form of entertainment. “Canceling someone has really become a sport,” he explained, noting that it often lacks sincerity and accountability.
He also drew attention to the disparity in whom cancel culture affects. While lesser-known individuals can be swiftly eliminated from the conversation after one faux pas, industry elites often escape unscathed. “If you’re an elite athlete, that’s proof of cancellation,” he asserted, pointing out that the rules seem to differ based on status.
