Pope’s Death Penalty Comments Stir Debate
On October 10, in a statement coinciding with World Day Against the Death Penalty, Pope Leo XIV sparked significant discussion by sharing his views on X.
The death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person. The common good can be safeguarded and the requirements of justice can be met without recourse to capital punishment: effective systems of detention have been developed that protect citizens while at the same time do not completely deprive those who are guilty of the possibility of redemption. #NoDeathPenalty
Liz Wheeler, host of BlazeTV, a Catholic herself, engaged with this contentious issue on a recent episode of “The Liz Wheeler Show.”
“This whole thing kicked off with the announcement [on October 8] from the Trump administration that, on December [3] of this year, a firing squad will execute former Major Nidal Hasan,” Liz stated. “He’s the ex-Army major who tragically killed 13 individuals at Fort Hood, all in the name of Islam. He’s being labeled as an Islamist terrorist.”
The Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, confirmed the execution would take place at Fort Hood—the very site of Hasan’s actions—and mentioned it would be streamed live, although it was noted that President Trump would ultimately decide whether the event would be publicized.
Liz is somewhat skeptical about the likelihood of the livestream, expressing her view that the wish to witness such an execution borders on “bloodlust.” However, she supports Pope Leo’s stance on the death penalty.
She pointed out that throughout most of its history, the Church upheld that the state could rightly impose capital punishment for serious crimes. Yet, since the late 20th century, popes like John Paul II and more recently, Francis—who adjusted the Catechism to label capital punishment as “inadmissible” due to its violation of human dignity—have shifted towards a more abolitionist perspective, which Leo XIV continues to uphold, sparking ongoing debate about whether this represents an evolution in doctrine or a break from previous teachings.
“The death penalty is different from what the Church defines as an intrinsic evil, such as abortion,” Liz explained.
“Yet, the terms used by Pope Leo and Pope Francis have varied. They emphasize ‘inadmissible,’ which is just another way of saying ‘unacceptable’,” she further clarified.
Referring to senior apologist Jimmy Akin from Catholic Answers, she noted that Pope Francis amended the Catechism acknowledging that, given today’s societal context—specifically modern prisons designed to hold substantial populations—there are no longer justifications for utilizing the death penalty.
“There may be times when the death penalty seems necessary, but not today in our modern era,” Liz said.
“You might agree or disagree with this perspective, but I do find it logical. It aligns with the consistent teachings of the Church and it doesn’t oppose the Bible,” she mentioned.
Still, the pertinent question lingers: “Is Pope Leo’s guidance merely pastoral—something we can respectfully disagree with—or is it an authoritative teaching we must accept fully?”
To delve deeper into this question, Liz spoke with Joe Heschmeyer from Catholic Answers.
To catch their full conversation, you can watch the episode above.
Pope Leo’s comments on the death penalty ignite discussion — Liz Wheeler clarifies the meaning of ‘inadmissible’
Pope’s Death Penalty Comments Stir Debate
On October 10, in a statement coinciding with World Day Against the Death Penalty, Pope Leo XIV sparked significant discussion by sharing his views on X.
Liz Wheeler, host of BlazeTV, a Catholic herself, engaged with this contentious issue on a recent episode of “The Liz Wheeler Show.”
“This whole thing kicked off with the announcement [on October 8] from the Trump administration that, on December [3] of this year, a firing squad will execute former Major Nidal Hasan,” Liz stated. “He’s the ex-Army major who tragically killed 13 individuals at Fort Hood, all in the name of Islam. He’s being labeled as an Islamist terrorist.”
The Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, confirmed the execution would take place at Fort Hood—the very site of Hasan’s actions—and mentioned it would be streamed live, although it was noted that President Trump would ultimately decide whether the event would be publicized.
Liz is somewhat skeptical about the likelihood of the livestream, expressing her view that the wish to witness such an execution borders on “bloodlust.” However, she supports Pope Leo’s stance on the death penalty.
She pointed out that throughout most of its history, the Church upheld that the state could rightly impose capital punishment for serious crimes. Yet, since the late 20th century, popes like John Paul II and more recently, Francis—who adjusted the Catechism to label capital punishment as “inadmissible” due to its violation of human dignity—have shifted towards a more abolitionist perspective, which Leo XIV continues to uphold, sparking ongoing debate about whether this represents an evolution in doctrine or a break from previous teachings.
“The death penalty is different from what the Church defines as an intrinsic evil, such as abortion,” Liz explained.
“Yet, the terms used by Pope Leo and Pope Francis have varied. They emphasize ‘inadmissible,’ which is just another way of saying ‘unacceptable’,” she further clarified.
Referring to senior apologist Jimmy Akin from Catholic Answers, she noted that Pope Francis amended the Catechism acknowledging that, given today’s societal context—specifically modern prisons designed to hold substantial populations—there are no longer justifications for utilizing the death penalty.
“There may be times when the death penalty seems necessary, but not today in our modern era,” Liz said.
“You might agree or disagree with this perspective, but I do find it logical. It aligns with the consistent teachings of the Church and it doesn’t oppose the Bible,” she mentioned.
Still, the pertinent question lingers: “Is Pope Leo’s guidance merely pastoral—something we can respectfully disagree with—or is it an authoritative teaching we must accept fully?”
To delve deeper into this question, Liz spoke with Joe Heschmeyer from Catholic Answers.
To catch their full conversation, you can watch the episode above.
Related News
Glenn Beck comments on the raid of Ilhan Omar’s home: ‘You should only challenge her if you’re fully prepared’
Nick Freitas refutes the claim that one cannot support both pro-life and the death penalty views.