If you’re watching CNN or MSNBC, or spotting daily content across various administration outlets like New York Times, Atlantic, Axios, Washington Post, Nation, HuffPost, Jezebel, and others, then here’s what you’re likely noticing…
These platforms are up and running around the clock. For MSNBC and CNN, it’s practically non-stop. But it goes deeper than that—it’s actually much worse.
In the words of my friend and former colleague Kurt Schlichter, it’s become painfully clear how the media seems to be advocating for our destruction: “They label us Nazis. What do they really want to happen to us?”
That’s a fair question.
What other moral actions exist apart from taking down the Nazis? You really don’t have an alternative. To be a hero means standing against them. That’s what it means to be brave in this context.
Now, if you substitute “Nazi” with an array of derogatory terms the media uses against us, you’ll see the pattern.
- They label us fascists—What do they wish to do to us?
- They say we’re rapists—What do they wish to do to us?
- They call us racists—What do they wish to do to us?
- They portray us as a threat to democracy—What do they wish to do to us?
- They identify us as white nationalists—What do they wish to do to us?
We’re all aware of the implications of “they.” We know we’ve lost two out of three major elections, not to mention the ongoing battle for public opinion.
Charlie Kirk was marked for demise. They wanted him gone. Just hours prior, Van Jones had defamed Kirk, accusing him of human trafficking with harsh language.
In Kurt Schlichter’s words, What do you think was intended for Charlie Kirk?
What was it that Charlie Kirk did to deserve these accusations? His crime? He simply stated the truth:
A white Ukrainian refugee was murdered for being white. Everybody knows that. Yet, if a random white person were to stab a law-abiding black person for no reason, it would spark a massive national outcry leading to political change. But Meghan Basham seems unbothered by the stabbing of a white woman.
Where’s the untruth in that? There isn’t one. That encapsulates Kirk’s wrongdoing. He didn’t lie; he simply spoke openly. He didn’t conform to being a “proper” Republican. So…
Should those who incite racial hatred be dealt with? Is eliminating such hatred somehow heroic?
Such rhetoric reveals how the media targets us for actual annihilation at the hands of left-leaning extremists.
Consider what motivates the media to paint President Trump and the MAGA movement as targets for assassination. What are the beliefs we hold dear?
- Secure the borders
- Deport illegal immigrants
- Imprison convicted criminals
- Reduce the size of federal bureaucracy
- Pursue peace in Ukraine
- End permanent gender transition for children
- Protect children from gender indoctrination
- Provide school vouchers for underprivileged kids
- Uphold biological truths regarding sex
- Oppose abortion
- Ensure women’s sports are protected from male participation
- Combat online censorship
- End deplatforming practices
- Focus on merit over racial quotas
That’s really all it is.
It’s common sense. Issues that would have seen bipartisan agreement a decade and a half ago.
But these days, the media encourages us to subscribe to their narrative. Literally encouraging demise.
After a decade of attacking Trump, where they’ve called neo-Nazis “very fine people,” did they expect no repercussions? What did they anticipate would unfold?
Whether it’s Van Jones, Jake Tapper, Abby Phillip, Katie Tar, Rachel Maddow, Matthew Dowd, or Wolf Blitzer, many may appear friendly in social settings, but their intentions toward us are far from friendly.
Once again, let’s echo Kurt Schlichter’s sentiment: They label you a fascist—what do they expect to happen to you?
Using every lawful and peaceful method at our disposal, it’s time for our elected officials to conduct accountable and rigorous evaluations from Trump on down. If they fail in that responsibility, we must seek out different representatives who are willing to take those bold steps.
