SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Progressive Rep. Pramila Jayapal reneges on support for axing filibuster after Democrat loses on Election Day 

It's a filibuster to me, but not to you.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), an outspoken critic of the Senate filibuster, said Monday that she does not support eliminating the procedural hurdle as long as Republicans control the White House and both chambers of Congress. .

“Now that the Senate has a three-way vote, do I support eliminating the filibuster? No,” said the Congressional Progressive Caucus chairman. Press conference at the National Diet Building.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), an outspoken critic of the Senate filibuster, said Monday that she does not support eliminating the procedural hurdle as long as Republicans control the White House and both chambers of Congress. . CSPAN

“But if we had won the trifecta, I would have done it too, because the government has to show what it can achieve,” Jayapal added.

Senate filibuster rules, which require a 60-vote threshold to end debate and pass most types of legislation in the Senate, are one of the biggest obstacles Democrats have to block President-elect Donald Trump's adoption of his agenda. This is seen as an opportunity, and Republicans have expressed opposition. It has a 53-47 majority in the Senate and is expected to maintain a slim majority in the House.

As of September, Jayapal was pushing to “abolish” what she called the “Jim Crow filibuster.”

“The filibuster was originally created *by mistake* in 1806. Every day we don't abolish it is just as big a mistake,” she wrote to X.

Washington Democrats hate that this procedural measure makes it harder for progressives to push their agenda through Congress.

Jayapal speaks with Boeing workers during a rally held by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 751 at union hall as the strike continues on October 15, 2024 in Seattle, Washington. Reuters

“It's the filibuster or a ban on assault weapons. It's the filibuster or codified access to abortion. It's the filibuster or raising the minimum wage. It's the filibuster or protecting voting rights. The choice is clear. . Abolish the Jim Crow filibuster,” Jayapal tweeted.

The progressive lawmaker argued Monday that passing a liberal agenda would have “build some trust with the American people.”

“Many of the things that are being passed because we took control of the trifecta and got rid of the filibuster, like passing the minimum wage, passing paid sick leave, and passing a very popular ballot measure, abortion access. If we had passed … I think we would have built some trust with the American people,” Jayapal argued.

As of September, Jayapal was pushing to “abolish” what she called the “Jim Crow filibuster.” Recording Academy Getty Images

“Remember, Republicans already lifted the filibuster on taxes,” she added.

When asked how he would resolve his previous demands to end the filibuster, Jayapal said of his newfound support for the filibuster: “I don't think I'm against it at all.” said.

Sen. John Thune (R-South Carolina), Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), and Sen. Rick Scott (R-Florida) are leading candidates to become Senate Majority Leader next year. Both have recently voiced opposition to the termination of Republican senators. filibuster.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News