California is set to initiate rezoning efforts ahead of the upcoming midterms, responding to similar actions taken by other Democratic states.
Governor Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) has announced plans to redraw the state’s congressional map, arguing that it is necessary to counteract moves by Texas Republicans.
However, the Democrats’ ambitions reach further. Party leaders in states like Illinois, New York, and Maryland are being urged to adopt strategies akin to Newsom’s to maintain party control and establish a counterbalance to President Trump after the elections.
Interestingly, while Newsom took the leading role, he seemingly neglected to inform leaders in Illinois and New York. Yet, discussions are quietly taking place among various stakeholders.
Eric Holder, former Attorney General under President Obama and current head of the National Democratic Constituency Committee, has called on House Democrats during a conference this week. He’s engaging with leaders from multiple states, including California, urging them to support efforts to redraw their maps as a critical response to Texas’s anticipated changes.
He stated, “In the past, we’ve operated under different circumstances, but this time we can’t afford to do so. Imagine if the president is unchallenged over the next two years.”
Meanwhile, New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D) mentioned earlier this month that she’s “exploring all options” to expedite redistricting.
“We’re actively working on the legislative processes and considering potential legal strategies,” she told reporters, emphasizing the importance of countering what she described as a direct attack.
In Illinois, Governor JB Pritzker (D) has hinted at the possibility of redrawing the congressional map in light of Texas’s actions, suggesting that all options to protect democracy must be considered. Other Illinois Democrats are encouraging him to take bold steps.
Senator Jessus “Chui” Garcia (D-Ill.) stated, “Trump’s actions demand a response. We can’t afford to wait while he undermines democracy,” while Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Ill.) has mentioned the potential for creating districts that accommodate urban, suburban, and rural areas to facilitate the redistricting process.
Support for these midterm rezoning initiatives marks a notable shift in the party’s strategy, as for years Democrats favored independent commissions to tackle redistricting following each decade’s census.
Yet, with Texas Republicans poised to make their moves soon, some Democrats feel a need to engage proactively. “You have to match the other side’s intensity,” remarked a lawmaker informed by Holder.
Nevertheless, the specifics of the redistricting process vary by state. In New York, the Rezoning Committee will commence the drawing of new congressional lines, pending Congressional approval before reaching the governor’s desk.
New York may not be able to finalize new maps in time for 2026, as constitutional amendments are necessary, which require passage through Congress in two consecutive sessions before putting it to a vote.
In contrast, Illinois and Maryland have more streamlined procedures for redistricting, as their legislatures directly oversee the process. However, opportunities for Democrats to gain seats in both states are more limited compared to New York.
Some improvements in traditionally Democratic states could also result in more competitive elections.
In the meantime, House Republicans have criticized Newsom’s plans, accusing him of using them to fuel his ambitions for 2028.
“Gavin Newsom’s latest actions are not about Californians; they reflect his desperate political aspirations,” declared Christian Martinez, a spokesman for the House Republican campaign committee.
Democrats have brushed off these criticisms, arguing that Trump’s influence has compelled them to respond. Historically, midterm cycles are challenging for the incumbent party, and Trump aims to obstruct Democratic gains that could lead to investigations of his actions.
Past hesitations within the Democratic Party regarding midterm redistricting due to concerns about setting a detrimental precedent are overshadowed by the perceived existential threat posed by an unchecked Trump administration. Many party members seem to agree on this point.
“People are increasingly united on this issue,” noted a Democratic lawmaker.
“While we have historically taken a different stance on redistricting, this time we simply can’t afford to do so.”
