Wind of Change

As the world grapples with the potential threat of digital election fraud, South Korea seems to be rushing into it.

On November 23, 2025, Lee Jae-myung, the current leader of South Korea, promised overseas Koreans, specifically the 7.5 million residing abroad, that he would implement electronic and postal voting due to travel inconveniences. He inaccurately claimed that the safety concerns surrounding this method had largely been addressed.

At first glance, this might appear helpful. But for those aware of the gradual decline of democracy in South Korea, this move could pave the way for a permanent digital one-party regime. (Related: Black Box Deception: Nationwide Digital Election Fraud)

Global War Over Truth

This isn’t just an isolated change in policy; it’s part of a broader global struggle. Recently, former President Donald Trump emphasized the need to focus on election fraud, even referencing a conversation about the book Stolen Elections: The Collapse of Democracy Around the World.

His statement serves as a modern-day call for sovereignty against the influence of globalist groups, akin to the original Magna Carta, which sought to limit the power of the monarchy in 1215 England. Back then, powerful barons demanded constraints on the king to prevent his arbitrary rule. Now, we are called to ensure election fairness worldwide.

Discussions by Pezzullo and Bahnsen suggest that election manipulation methods linked to systems like Smartmatic and Dominion originated in Venezuela, spreading globally. It’s believed that these methods have made their way to South Korea through bodies like A-Web, which may be influenced by the Chinese Communist Party.

While major G7 nations like Germany have reverted to hand-counting paper ballots, South Korea’s left-leaning factions are pushing for digitized voting, clearly seeing it as a benefit for themselves.

Forensic Evidence and “Anomalies”

Worries about election irregularities in South Korea are substantiated by compelling evidence. After the general election in April 2020, Professor Walter Mebane from the University of Michigan used his election forensics toolkit on the results, revealing alarming statistical “anomalies” that hint at possible fraud.

Witness accounts reported odd ballots, like those dubbed “cabbage leaves” (marked by printing errors) and “arrow” ballots (which consist of scribbles rather than actual votes). The National Election Commission (NEC) has, however, refused to release the server’s source code. They seem to be banking on the statistical principle that early voting results shouldn’t stray too far from same-day voting outcomes.

Battle of Philosophies: Order vs. Chaos

So, why is this happening? The answer isn’t purely political; it dives into the realms of philosophy and spirit.

As Noam Chomsky has noted, in a democracy, media control serves as a significant tool for manipulation—much like a weapon in a totalitarian state. In South Korea, a “media cartel” silences those seeking truth, labeling them “conspiracy theorists” to enforce social compliance.

We’re witnessing a collapse of absolute truth. Francis Schaeffer’s work How Should We Then Live? warns that in the absence of absolute moral standards, chaos follows. The left in South Korea appears to have abandoned fundamental morals like “don’t steal” or “don’t lie,” opting instead for a system of political correctness and populism. This shift spurred President Yoon Seok-yeol to declare martial law in a desperate bid to counteract what he sees as “anti-national forces” infiltrating the government. His impeachment didn’t reflect justice; it showcased a corrupt system attempting to protect itself. I touched on this in a past piece. (Related: Red Shadow Destroying South Korea)

Call to Arms

The struggle for election integrity in Seoul mirrors that in Washington. If South Korea falls into a “digital dictatorship,” it could set a dangerous precedent for globalism.

Thus, on behalf of countless free Koreans, I urge a return to truth. Our modern-day Magna Carta starts with demanding the release of President Yoon Seok-yeol, who aimed to liberate the people from perceived threats.

Moreover, there must be a push to dismantle tools that could facilitate digital fraud. Aligning with the G7’s initiatives for fair elections, South Korea should abolish electronic voting, reverting instead to mandatory same-day voting with paper ballots and manual counting.

This means that Lee Jae-myung’s plans for digital foreign voting—an obvious route to unverifiable fraud—should be scrapped immediately. Lastly, the NEC should be subjected to an independent audit of its server’s source code and any dubious ties to A-Web or the CCP.

“Convenience” must not be a guise for tyranny. We have to stand against theft, not just in Korea, but globally.