Democratic strategist Donna Brazile said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” that the Supreme Court came close to “interfering with the election” by considering former President Donald Trump’s immunity request after hearing oral arguments. Ta.
“I’ve never been here before, and I’ve been involved in presidential politics and campaigns for several years, almost 30 years, and in Donald’s case, you have to find talking points when you have an opponent,” Brazile said. I never thought it would happen,” he said. Mr. Trump does not go on the campaign trail and sits in court all day. ”
She continued, “Now that I remember, I have to make a statement.” Bush vs. Gore It’s like it was yesterday. I believe the Supreme Court is hanging onto election interference by delaying the election. I’m not a lawyer, but I was able to attend an oral argument the other day. What I heard again was that they weren’t talking about the facts of the case. They came up with all these hypotheses. They should allow this case to proceed in District Court on January 6th, and we need to know the outcome before the election. ”
She added, “You can still argue about the timing. The district court of appeals handed down this ruling in February. Jack Smith said that all along, but the special counsel said that in December. “Please, please,” I said. Even after making a decision, they drag their feet. ”
She said: “Any delay in justice is the denial of democracy. That’s what’s at stake.”
Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN
