The Supreme Court plans to decide whether to Maryland's parents to file an objection. LGBTQ book in the classroomWe have a constitutional right to choose children from classes that are contrary to family religion.
Parents of Monghomery County, Maryland have asserted the rights of children. school They are infringing religious freedom by not allowing to opt out lessons using books that take up the LGBTQ story. On Friday, the Supreme Court has decided to consider this issue.
According to court documents, the school district hoped that the school district would incorporate it into the classroom by providing books to teachers, arranging them on bookshelves, using them for reading, and recommending them to students. According to an article in the previous FOX news, when this policy was first introduced, parents were given options to opt out children, but according to legal submitted documents, very many students are opt -out. It has been suggested that this option has been stripped, as the absence rate has increased.
“On March 22, 2023, the Board of Education chooses to use one of the storybooks in the classroom, as claimed in the revised complaint. A notice will be sent. ” If the child chose to opt -out, the teacher said, “I will find an alternative textbook for that student,” which supports the same linguistic standards and goals. document state.
“The next day, the Board of Directors has no explanation, and has completely turned it upside down that the notification and opt -out options will not be accepted in the future,” he continued. “The revised policy has come into effect immediately, but the previous requests for accommodations did not apply to the end of the 2022-2023 grade, and in the current 2023 to 2024 grades, students and their parents will be notified and notified. The first year of the storybook.
The book in question is working on themes on the same gender relationship, including coming out of being a transgender and participating in LGBTQ events. According to legal documents, teachers have also given documents on how to deal with students about the theme featured in picture books.
“For example, if the student says,” It's wrong (gay, lesbian, quia, etc.), not allowed in my religion, “the teacher said,” I understand that you believe it. You can answer that, but you don't have to understand or support that person's identity to treat with respect and kindness. ” (JA 595) “is written in the court document. “In this guidance, if the student says,” Girls are girls, they only like boys. ” [d]”Actually, any gender person can like the person you like.. What do you think of __ (character name) __ when you hear what you say? Do you think it's fair to decide who you can like or who you don't like? “
The plaintiff is composed of the association of the parent of the polygamy and opposes this content.
Universities and educational organizations provide advice to travel to Washington DC for Trump Oath on the day of the inauguration ceremony
File -The Supreme Court of the United States will be held in Washington on November 15, 2023. (AP Photo/Mariam Zheb, File)
The Heritage Foundation Senior Legal Legal Researcher Sarah Partial Perry says he believes that his parents will won the appeal.
“The concept that parents are the main authority of children's education and welfare are rooted in the perceptions of family families, which have been in biology, the nature of parent -child relationships, and the prosperous society.” She said. I wrote.
Perry told Fox News Digital that this lawsuit represents “a very fast -growing legal field where many of the gender identity clashes directly with the religious beliefs of parents.”
“We will see this situation more and more, and the fact that this is a multi -religious coalition is that this is a problem, and if the judge does not do so, it will take further measures. I think it's a concrete show, “please deal with it directly.” “I believe it was part of the theoretical basis for the first lawsuit.”
A law expert explained that there was a precedent for the following ruling. Student right In terms of public education, the freedom of religion is guaranteed.
Click here to get the FOX News App
“The incident is in many ways, and it is directly connected to the 1972 Wisconsin vs. Yoda case many years ago,” Perry recalled. “In this case, the Supreme Court infringed on their right to exercise their freedom because the parent of Armish does not want to let children go to public schools after the eighth grade under the Wisconsin's Compulsory Education Law. They ruled that they were, and they needed their parents as part of religious beliefs. ” Is considered to be an infringement of their free religious rights, which is exactly what we are doing here, contradicting the national interests. Article 1 of the Constitution's revision is the exercise of free religion and the rights of parent. ”
Fox News Digital contacted the Montgomery County Board of Education and said, “I can't publish a statement at the moment.”
The fourth round court in the document that the original ruling opposed the parent to give a provisional discrepancy order, “At this stage, the parent is recognized for the right of free use to meet the requirements of free use. Because it did not provide enough evidence to show the burden. ” Exercise request. “
