New Restrictions on Classroom Topics in Texas Tech University System

Texas Tech University System Chancellor Brandon Clayton has introduced new guidelines regarding discussions of race, gender, gender identity, and sexual orientation in the classroom. Instructors who fail to follow these guidelines may face disciplinary measures.

Professor Creighton emphasized the importance of not teaching that any race or gender holds inherent superiority, or that individuals are automatically discriminatory due to their characteristics. The memo asserts, “We must not imply that moral integrity is tied to race or gender.” It suggests that attributing responsibility or guilt for actions to people based on their race or gender—well, that’s a slippery slope. The idea that meritocracy itself could be viewed as oppressive is also rejected in this framework.

The memo also clarifies what is meant by “promotion” of these beliefs, indicating this refers to presenting them as absolute truths rather than as one of many perspectives.

A flowchart accompanies the memo, detailing a new approval process for course content that touches on restricted topics. Faculty members are now required to submit their course material for review by department heads, administrators, and the Board of Directors.

Instructors must first assess whether course material is relevant and necessary. In cases where the material is essential for professional licensure or care, it may remain, but the Board will need to be notified. Any content deemed unnecessary must be submitted for approval, followed by an assessment by administrative levels before reaching the Board.

Creighton noted that these rules intend to foster “clarity, consistency, and guardrails that protect academic excellence.”

The system officials indicated the memo aims to guide faculty in preparation for the upcoming spring semester, with hopes for a swift approval process. However, the document warns that non-compliance could lead to disciplinary action.

Kelly Cargile Cook, a long-time professor at Texas Tech University, shared her discontent with the new restrictions, stating she felt compelled to cancel a class she had eagerly anticipated and ultimately resigned. She voiced her concerns about the memo, mentioning how it superficially presents agreeable principles but could compromise academic rigor when put into practice.

Creighton’s memo marks a “first step” toward implementing Senate Bill 37, a law that requires a thorough review of undergraduate coursework to ensure it aligns with the state’s workforce needs. This review is set for 2027.

This change comes after a Texas State Polytechnic University professor faced backlash for a class discussion on gender identity, resulting in their termination and the president’s resignation. In September, the Texas Tech System imposed restrictions on faculty discussions related to gender identity.

Academic professionals expressed concerns about limitations stemming from directives that deter discussions about transgender identities, experiencing pressure to self-censor. The new chancellor took over last month after the previous president’s departure.

Texas Tech’s policy appears to be a more stringent response compared to Texas A&M University System’s recent rules, which also required administration approval for certain topics. Critics are questioning whether these developments infringe on First Amendment rights while potentially harming transgender students.

Andrew Martin, representing the Texas Tech University chapter of the American Association of University Professors, expressed disappointment with the memorandum. He had hoped for constructive discussions about academic freedom and the importance of protecting it.