The efficiency department of the government has been tracking the flow of dollars between government entities and partisan activists. However, this data flow may hint at a more significant issue.
The alarming narrative around government weaponization must be viewed through the lens of a covert data-sharing network. This system has been manipulated to interfere with elections, target opponents, and suppress certain voices.
Despite lacking constitutional authority to collect personal data, the Biden administration has identified a workaround.
Federal agencies have begun outsourcing potentially unconstitutional data collection to politically affiliated partners.
Rather than gathering data directly, they either acquired it from nonprofits or tech firms or sold it to them.
My book discusses three key areas where this misuse thrived: election meddling, civil surveillance, and the diminishing of free speech.
The quiet manipulation of voters through our data warrants immediate attention for safeguarding future elections.
The focus on budget inquiries may capture headlines, but the underlying scandal runs deeper.
An executive order from Biden mandated that all federal agencies roll out supposedly independent voter registration efforts.
However, the actual application of these initiatives often diverged significantly.
For instance, small business leaders diverted limited resources towards voter outreach that favored specific party interests.
Federal agencies actively engaged targeted states, like Arizona and Georgia, regarding their official voter designations, despite federal law mandating that states initiate the process.
Emails, obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, show the Small Business Administration leaning towards liberal voting demographics, even organizing events aimed at increasing Democratic voter registration in areas viewed as favorable.
At a 2024 hearing, a lawmaker pressed SBA’s Jennifer Kim about her agency’s outreach efforts in non-liberal areas. She didn’t directly answer but claimed that partisan politics played no role in their strategies. This scenario showcases the contradiction rooted in documented biases.
What’s unsettling is this approach wasn’t incidental. It seems like a calculated effort to utilize our data, backed by partisans, all while evading transparency.
The outcome? A voter base quietly reshaped and financed without public awareness.
This breach of trust—turning our information into a political weapon—chips away at democracy itself.
My book unravels this web and explains how government agencies and their partners have weaponized services without our knowledge.
This manipulation of voters serves as an initial attempt. The Biden administration has expanded warrantless surveillance measures, aiming to silence dissent, pressing financial entities to flag “suspicious” transactions, and attacking opposition.
This includes targeting certain organizations and even members of the Trump family unjustly.
By acquiring and sharing data with activist groups and businesses, financial regulators circumvented legal barriers against data collection.
If this weaponization of data goes unchecked, it may extend beyond the current administration.
The Biden administration’s expansion of the NSA’s surveillance capabilities means an influx of data is being gathered, covering everything from phone records to email correspondence, away from public view.
This data compile threatens to drown out many voices.
Social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube have found themselves under scrutiny, with cybersecurity agencies flagging millions of posts as “misinformation” throughout 2023.
Ultimately, some true but politically sensitive information has been overshadowed by labels marking it as false.
The efforts have worked to amplify bias, with certain media outlets receiving disproportionately low ratings for reliability, influencing advertisers to steer clear of them and thus shrinking their revenue.
Meanwhile, left-leaning publications like NPR and the New York Times continue to achieve high ratings irrespective of their reporting missteps.
Government-backed AI tools are reportedly suppressing conservative narratives, effectively minimizing their visibility in search results.
YouTube has adjusted its algorithms at federal demands, which, coupled with restrictions from NGOs, hampers the expression of dissenting views.
This isn’t just a temporary issue. If this data misuse remains unaddressed, it won’t end with the Democrats or the Biden administration.
Historically, the loss of freedom for one group often paves the way for broader oppression later. Today, the target is conservatives. Tomorrow, it could be anyone who dares to disagree.
Yet, there is a glimmer of hope. Transparency is crucial; all Americans, regardless of political affiliation, must push for accountability from the government and its partners.
We can fight back through methods like boycotts and legal actions.
Upholding free speech and cultivating an open exchange of ideas are foundational to our democracy. When powerful entities work to silence dissent, they not only betray critics but also undermine the Constitution.
“They’re coming for you” can be the rallying cry to shine a light on this corruption. The onus to halt it lies with us all. Demand the truth and accountability.
Above all, let’s safeguard the freedoms that make America a symbol of liberty.
