As Congress focuses on boosting American manufacturing and global trade, it’s worth noting the potential of a resource often overlooked: our driveways.
Each year, about 37 million tons of recyclable household materials end up in landfills and incinerators in the US. This not only weakens our supply chain but also leads to increased costs for American manufacturers and wastes taxpayer resources. If we genuinely want to enhance domestic production, keep money circulating in the local economy, and bolster US competitiveness, there’s a real need to modernize recycling systems and expand access for every household.
Recycling is already a significant component of the American industrial landscape, with recycled materials making up 40% of manufacturing inputs. People are doing their part—setting out blue bins, recycling batteries, and returning pallets. However, the reality is uneven; over 41% of Americans still don’t have access to basic recycling services. This results in billions of dollars’ worth of raw materials being wasted each year, highlighting a clear opportunity for Congress.
A bipartisan initiative, the Circle Act, led by Suozzi (D-NY) and Fitzpatrick (R-PA), offers a practical solution. The bill proposes a 30% investment tax credit aimed at businesses, nonprofits, and individuals who build or enhance their recycling infrastructure, covering everything from curbside collection to processing.
This model is proven effective. Similar tax credits have spurred growth in sectors like solar energy and semiconductors. This approach could encourage innovation, reduce risks for private investors, and strengthen our domestic supply chain. Past investments indicate a solid return. For instance, a commitment of $17 billion under the Universal Recycle Access program could generate over 200,000 jobs and return about $8.8 billion worth of materials to the economy while saving nearly $10 billion for taxpayers over five years. That’s a significant return on investment.
There’s also a growing global consensus on the need for such action. As states gather to discuss a global treaty addressing plastic pollution, the US has a chance to take the lead, showcasing its capability in waste management, sustainability, and economic growth through investments in domestic recycling infrastructure.
We can’t afford to throw away valuable materials like glass, metal, plastic, or paper. Plus, it’s essential to implement an extended producer responsibility policy that requires manufacturers to contribute to a more effective system, as seen in several states across the US and globally.
The EPA’s Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling Grant Programs lay a solid foundation. This initiative received bipartisan support during the Trump administration and currently has attracted a significant number of applicants. These types of investments are cost-effective and enjoy support from both major political parties. As the EPA aims for a revival, continuing funding for recycling grant programs makes sense.
However, there’s more to be done. As we see increased use of recycled plastics, it’s crucial that health and safety standards are maintained for their use in food and household items. As manufacturers turn more to recycled content, clear regulations become vital. Protecting public health should go hand in hand with promoting recycling.
Recycling uniquely connects rural, suburban, and urban interests. It creates jobs, reduces waste, lowers costs for businesses, and generates environmental benefits. At a time when many Americans are looking for tangible solutions, this is an opportunity for Congress and the administration to act decisively.
Passing the Circle Act would send a strong message: the US is ready to lead in smart, sustainable manufacturing. Recycling stands as a viable pathway toward job creation, resilience, and economic strength. Let’s stop squandering potential and start investing in it.
