America deserves better than a failing propaganda machine dressed as “elite” journalism. We’re more than the chaotic spectacle the Democrats have turned into.
The New York Times and the Washington Post completely overlooked DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s significant press conference on Wednesday. During that event, she revealed that she has forwarded criminal referrals to the DOJ and FBI, hinting at former President Barack Obama and his national security team regarding the “inflammatory conspiracy” surrounding the Russian collusion narrative.
It’s no surprise that many top-tier Democrats have shifted their allegiance to the Trump GOP. True, principled leaders, like Gabbard and Bobby Kennedy Jr., who once inspired hope among Democrats, are now extensions of Trump’s administration, while many voters quietly change their affiliations. Only the wealthiest individuals and a few controlled lower factions seem to stick around in a party that has lost its way, yet it remains a potential threat.
Over the years, we’ve become increasingly concerned about the absence of concealed truths, revealing just how corrupt the leading Democrats—Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden—truly are.
No wonder their party feels stagnant. “Constipated. Leaderless. Confusing. A broken clown car. Divided,” is how veteran Democratic strategist James Carville described it recently.
Democrats’ Exploitation
Yet the party’s energy often feels drained, much like Zoran Mamdani—a product of privilege—possibly becoming New York City’s mayor. His influence is pervasive.
When Hunter Biden finally surfaced to criticize Obama and his camp, even the politically ambitious Hollywood star George Clooney seemed to be listening in. “What right does he have to step on a man who served this country for over fifty years?” Hunter posed, and well, there’s a valid point there.
Still, Hunter’s been on a quest to market himself for a potential presidential run in 2028, babbling for hours on several podcasts.
His friends make no secret of his political aspirations. In his writings, he reflects on his ex-wife Kathleen’s disbelief when he expressed his intent to take over the Biden legacy after his brother’s passing. “Seriously?” she replied, reminding him he had just been discharged from the Navy Reserve following a cocaine test.
In what may be a setup for 2028, Hunter has been laying out some pretty extreme political views lately—favoring open borders, feigning concerns for working-class individuals, and addressing health issues with a focus on moderation. He’s even practiced delivering his lines in front of a mirror.
“What if I run for president in two years, four years, or even three?” he pondered.
Don’t be shocked if we find ourselves facing off against Hunter Biden, George Clooney, AOC, and Jasmine Crockett in future elections.
If you think the current chaos is entertaining, just wait—it might get worse for all of us.
It’s not healthy for one party to spiral in this manner.
The Democrats have shown over the past six months that they’re resistant to acknowledging their mistakes. But Gabbard is forcing some accountability by carefully declassifying Russian collusion evidence, aiming to shine a light on the manipulators who exploited Obama and his intelligence agency while undermining Trump during his presidency.
Inadequate Evidence
White House Press Director Caroline Leavitt introduced Gabbard on Wednesday, highlighting troubling, newly declassified evidence that undermined former CIA director John Brennan, former FBI director James Comey, and others, who pretended to support a peaceful transfer of power.
“Former President Obama took extensive and unsettling measures to create discord and sabotage his successor, Trump,” Leavitt claimed.
“New evidence from DNI Gabbard affirms that the Obama administration produced politicized intelligence reports prior to the 2016 elections,” she continued.
“The claims of Russian collusion were elaborate frauds that misled the American public from the very beginning, and Obama was aware of the ongoing deception.”
Leavitt then challenged the New York Times and the Washington Post, accusing the latter of regurgitating intelligence narratives crafted by Obama’s associates, producing “absurd” content that sought praise from prestigious awards.
“It has been a long time since those awards were rescinded for unethical journalism,” she added. “It’s not genuine reporting if it spreads political misinformation that benefits certain political entities.”
Gabbard revealed a series of significant claims, including:
- Brennan suppressed intelligence indicating that Russia did not support Trump, believing instead that Hillary Clinton would win the 2016 election. Russia delayed revealing evidence against Clinton until after the elections to weaken her presidency.
- The Russian foreign intelligence agency obtained DNC communications indicating that Clinton was battling severe emotional distress and was reportedly on heavy tranquilizers.
- The December 2016 intelligence briefings indicated Russia did not interfere in the 2016 elections, according to assessments ordered by Obama.
- Documents fabricated by the CIA’s top Russian experts were found mixed in crucial intelligence reports.
- Brennan confirmed the inaccuracies, suggesting a manipulation of the intelligence process.
Gabbard concluded that the evidence pointed directly to the political maneuvers that facilitated an “annual coup against President-elect Donald Trump.”
When CNN queried Gabbard about her motives, suggesting she was merely seeking Trump’s favor, the New York Times’ coverage downplayed her claims, dismissing them as a mere attempt to divert attention.
The Washington Post mirrored that sentiment, showcasing similar bias.
It’s remarkable how they manage to overlook the core issues while the media continues to sidestep the conversation.
