Hello, readers.
As usual, they’re all wrong and I’m right.
What are we to make of the two great fires in our midst?
Let’s get started.
Bushwick Pied Piper
Right now, some intense debates are happening within conservative circles. The Heritage Foundation is facing a critical challenge related to loyalty towards Israel.
I believe this is a crucial evaluation and one we can’t really dodge, especially when considering future American conservatives. These individuals seem less inclined to shoulder the significance of Jerusalem, focusing more on immediate issues.
The narratives from both the left and the right about Mamdani’s win in New York City are largely myths. Leftists portray it as a striking criticism of Trumpism, similar to a populist uprising. Meanwhile, Trump’s take is more pragmatic, pointing out that government shutdowns are detrimental.
And, well, there’s some truth to that.
Mamdani clinched his victory with strong support from three key demographics: educated women, educated men, and newcomers to New York, including both immigrants and domestic transplants.
Conversely, working-class, native-born New Yorkers without degrees sided heavily with Cuomo, voting at a rate of 2-to-1.
Reflecting on these trends, political analyst Bhatia Unger aptly dubbed Mamdani the “Pied Piper of Bushwick.”
“Mamdani’s followers are overqualified yet aimless 20- and 30-something hipsters who believe they’re part of the working class due to their student loans,” she argues. “He is essentially the patron saint of eager young socialists in the neighborhood.”
Bingo! She hit the nail on the head.
So, where do we go from here?
—
On the subject of the government shutdown, Trump is actively encouraging the Senate to bypass the filibuster. This mechanism allows the minority party to prolong debate indefinitely unless 60 senators agree to bring it to a close.
It’s understandable why conservative observers might question Trump’s urgent lobbying for filibuster reform.
One can’t help but think: “What would Biden have done under similar circumstances?”
Another commenter suggested that if intense changes were needed, it would only be to push through a series of bills that could isolate Democrats for some time.
Well… that’s an interesting perspective.
—
Mamdani isn’t the real fire to worry about. Honestly, I doubt he’ll have lasting impacts on New York City as long as he has Albany in his corner and can manage resources like public transportation.
The significant issue is the roots of his emergence, one that might be addressed within a single presidential term.
—
Ever seen those short videos that begin with a kid in a graduation robe from prestigious universities? The kid might say something like, “I studied decolonizing early Roman history,” or something equally esoteric.
Then, the scene flips to a conservative individual ordering, “That’s lovely. I’ll have a large espresso latte, please.”
I’ve come across this numerous times. The punchline usually emphasizes the perceived futility of such expensive educations, and yet they do hold some value. Many students graduate but find themselves fighting for diminishing job opportunities, often ending up in fields like coffee shops in Bushwick. They remain in debt as living costs rise and the dream of homeownership slips further away. Given these circumstances, it’s not surprising they lean towards socialism.
But instead of mocking them, shouldn’t we address the issue head-on?
—
“When 70% of millennials identify as pro-socialist, we ought to engage rather than dismiss them as foolish, privileged, or brainwashed. Understanding might be our best approach,” shared Peter Thiel in letters to tech leaders back in 2020.
“From the view of a fractured generational contract, the answer seems simple: High student debt or unaffordable housing leads either to continuous negative equity or makes it tough to build up capital through real estate.”
“People detached from the capitalist system likely will abandon it.”
—
Instead of merely trying to navigate the filibuster, Trump should focus on dismantling the growing Marxist influence.
To start, we ought to halt the “education” of these “hipsters.”
In my opinion, abolishing the filibuster and cutting federal funding would significantly benefit future generations and essentially dismantle much of the Democratic Party’s power.
Next, we must notify universities or private loan providers: If students declare bankruptcy, half of their debt falls on the school, and the other half simply disappears.
This change would swiftly alter financial priorities among lenders and schools that have been too reliant on easy funds.
No more wasteful programs. Study areas that don’t promise job opportunities? No way.
We need to emphasize STEM fields, medical professions, and construction management—Bushwick hipsters don’t need any more non-essential courses.
Redirecting financial assistance toward these sectors could prompt the left-leaning Democratic Party to tackle redistricting for elections. Can you envision AOC persuading a group of engineers and tradespeople to vote for her?
Increasing the number of debt-free Americans means more homes, more food, and more energy. This is vital.
It would also help dismantle the intellectual pipeline that has cultivated partisan divisions on the left for years.
Are universities likely to face challenges? Certainly. Thousands of faculty and administrative positions could be at stake.
However, with new leadership, many could adjust and find relevant work.
—
Moreover, immigration—both legal and illegal—needs to be addressed. Simply cut the flow off completely.
Hmm!
Mamdani’s time seems to have passed.
—
You might argue, “The Democrats will reclaim power and revert everything back.”
They might be that audacious, but do they truly think that once the necessary changes are made, Americans will simply agree to revert back?
Were we so thrilled about student loans holding us back from starting families and owning homes? $2 trillion in student debt? Let’s add more!
Or
Did I enjoy an influx of unemployed, unskilled foreign men wandering around my neighborhood? Please, let’s bring them back!
I doubt the Democrats will push that narrative too far. Regardless of how much they lean into “empathy,” the American public will likely resist.
Just as not everyone deserves to use another’s funds for art, not everyone is entitled to reside here.
—
Well, that’s my forecast. I’ve been voicing this for a while.
I sincerely hope they heed this message because changes are necessary.
From my perspective, Israel ranks as a tertiary concern. If the factors that brought Mamdani to prominence become widespread, Washington will lose its influence.
What I Am Reading
Welcome to the Reign, Zoran!
‘Angry Mamdani’: Socialist mayoral candidate braces for tough reality test, analyst says
—
Scott Jennings makes some astute observations.
Scott Jennings discusses what we all think (or should) regarding a Democratic victory
—
It’s impressive how some individuals remain committed to losing.
Exclusive: John Thune defies Trump on filibuster, sharing his reasoning.
