In light of increasing global threats, it’s imprudent to dismantle effective national security strategies. Yet, that’s precisely what Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did by declaring the removal of the women, peace, and security (WPS) initiative from the Department of Defense, labeling the agenda as “woke.” This perspective is not just misguided—it poses a real danger.
WPS isn’t some obscure program; it has a solid legal foundation. Established with broad bipartisan support, it was signed into law by President Trump in 2017. Key defenders included Kristi Noem, now Secretary of Homeland Security, and Senator Marco Rubio, who is now Secretary of State, alongside influential Democratic leaders like Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Jan Schakowsky.
This law reflects a vital truth: when women participate in national security discussions, conflict resolution, peace talks, and rebuilding efforts, the outcomes are often more favorable. Peace lasts longer, communities bounce back quicker, and missions operate more effectively.
This isn’t just a pleasing notion; it’s a policy firmly grounded in years of research and real-world evidence from conflict regions, where women often serve as the initial responders and crucial support for families, unfortunately frequently overlooked.
In situations where rape is weaponized and societal stability crumbles, women are anything but passive observers. They rebuild educational facilities, lead efforts for reconciliation, and work towards restoring order. The WPS Act acknowledges their critical role and mandates four US agencies to bolster this through training and strategic oversight.
The initiatives under WPS at the Department of Defense provide significant advantages and contribute to a competitive edge in military contexts. Promoting women’s active involvement in the military, establishing dedicated advisors within the Department of Defense, and collaborating with allies ensures that American servicemembers can approach their missions more comprehensively.
Disbanding the advancements made by WPS contradicts both legal frameworks and empirical evidence. Astonishingly, it effectively hands a victory to adversaries by marginalizing half our populace from addressing global challenges.
Women’s roles in peace and security transcend ideology; they are about real impact. The essence of WPS is to bolster safety, strength, and intelligence.
President Trump should direct his Cabinet to adhere to the laws he himself enacted. Congress needs to maintain funding for these initiatives.
Women, peace, and security represent more than prudent strategies. They are legislative mandates critical to our national interests.
