Construction or Destruction: A Call for Hope in Higher Education
Every generation grapples with a crucial decision: whether to build or destroy. Right now, higher education stands at a pivotal point. As a scientist and trustee at Columbia University, I have seen how institutions can be endangered—sometimes by those once regarded as champions of intellectual progress, and other times by internal ideologies that breed frustration and an aversion to constructive discourse.
My family fled Iran during the revolution, escaping violence and oppression. As a Persian Jew, we moved to the United States—this country, symbolic of hope and opportunity. Through hard work and education, we’ve pursued what many call the “American Dream.” We’re now practicing various professions like medicine, science, and engineering, all while being dedicated parents.
Jewish Students Settle Religious Discrimination Lawsuits Against Columbia
My journey at Columbia began with a PhD that shaped my life. It led to scientific discoveries and the founding of a biotech firm focusing on rare diseases. The environment of curiosity and exploration at Columbia has its roots in principles of academic freedom and strong leadership.
Yet, by the spring of 2024, my home buzzed with students—including my kids and their friends—who felt unsafe at Columbia. Their fears didn’t stem from academic challenges or heated debates; rather, they were prompted by tangible threats. Protests often overwhelmed the campus, fueled by a troubling tolerance embedded within the institution, leading to closures in classrooms and libraries.
Recently, a report from Columbia highlighted concerns about anti-Semitism and campus climate. Notably, students from both Jewish (87%) and Muslim (83%) backgrounds reported feeling apprehensive about expressing their beliefs, with a stark majority feeling unsafe in that environment.
After voicing my worries about anti-Semitism, I became a target for criticism from certain media outlets that sought to discredit my work and contributions over the years.
This is where critics often miss the point: destruction comes easily, while construction is a challenge. We, as a country, take pride in our builders—those driving innovation, research advancements, and drug discoveries. Builders tackle problems with creativity and passion. In contrast, destroyers often sow negativity and confusion without contributing solutions. It takes true courage to create something new and share it with the world.
That’s partly why I sought to contribute back to my alma mater. I’ve watched those eager to tear down the very institution I owe much of my success to, often hidden behind screens or masks, evading personal accountability. Yes, destruction attracts attention, but such actions are fleeting. The positive changes we forge can have a lasting impact. My experiences have shown me that while creation is often a tough and unglamorous task, it bears the weight of dedication and commitment.
Columbia has long been a hub for innovation, nurturing future politicians, Nobel laureates, and pioneering medical professionals. The university fosters the intellect that shapes economies and brings about peace.
The narrative surrounding Columbia is one of progress, crafted through generations of effort. But this progress is at risk of being undone. The ongoing campaigns against the institution often masquerade as civil dialogue but lean more towards exaggeration and criticism rather than constructive engagement. Many are adept at destroying but not at building; the damage they inflict is loud yet short-lived, while builders create paths forward that truly advance humanity.
This issue extends beyond the confines of Columbia. It raises significant questions about moral choices and responsibilities in influencing our nation. Should we uplift our academic institutions or dismantle them? Are we encouraging students to think critically and grow, or allowing silencing threats to suppress differing opinions and diminish educational opportunities?
As parents, our role in educating the next generation begins at home, teaching them to contribute positively to society—to build rather than destroy. This foundation must continue at our top-tier institutions, where emerging leaders learn the value of diverse viewpoints. We should champion nonviolent expression, open dialogue, and a genuine willingness to listen and learn.
Our educational institutions should embody the hope and freedom our country represents. Together, we can reshape places like Columbia, ensuring they stand against hatred and confusion, fostering inclusivity and respect. This moment is pivotal; it demands courage and collective effort. Let’s come together to rebuild, reinforcing the great values that define us as a nation.
