Wife of J.D. Vance Usha defended. She deemed her husband’s “childless Catwoman” comment a “joke.” Unfortunately, as expected, the Guardian, CNN, MSNBC and our network channels will not accept that explanation for the outrage they denounce. Vance’s comments show he is a “nut” and should not be a presidential candidate. As corporate media and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) have said, “American Heartland Democrats.”
No matter how crazy positions Tim Walz and Kamala Harris have taken in their careers as radical left politicians – including expressing sympathy for the arsonists who burned down Minneapolis during the “Summer of Love” – there is no reason to be uncomfortable with these politicians, according to the media. Even if Walz were to institute a law that puts tampons in men’s restrooms and allows children to have genital mutilation without parental consent, I doubt many of these “childless catwomen” would object. After all, aren’t these women the ones who believe in gender fluidity, fight “patriarchy,” and impose diversity, equity, and inclusion on everyone, just like Walz and Kamala?
It’s ridiculous to think that Vance will lose the feminist vote because of comments he made a few years ago. The women who are yelling at him will never vote for Trump or him.
It doesn’t hurt that Vance says that this “irony” doesn’t refer to women who can’t have children or who don’t have husbands who can. He was referring to a type of person that is now commonplace, and one that I’ve encountered many times over my 40-plus years as a scholar. Many embattled feminists see childbearing as a capitulation to masculinity, and unlimited abortion rights as essential to fighting back against what they see as a male-dominated society. Other women oppose reproduction as an environmental evil, and are vocal in their views.
It’s absurd to think that Vance’s comments from a few years ago will cost him the feminist vote, even though the truth of those comments is clear to me. The women who criticize Vance will never vote for Trump or him. They are ecstatic to be able to vote for a radical, conscious alternative, and they have a deep loathing for anyone running for the Republican nomination. Moreover, Republicans should not be horrified by Vance’s comments any more than Democrats are horrified to hear a candidate criticize a pro-life Christian or a white working-class high school dropout who objects to public school teachers sexualizing young people.
Despite the double standards the left has imposed on us, I have found regulars in the Murdoch media empire agonizing over the question of whether the Republican Party can retain Vance as its presidential candidate after his seemingly inexcusable actions. rudeIf there is one virtue that the Republican Party has represented for decades, It is a fetishistic attachment to social respectability.The system persists no matter how radical and outrageous its opponents become. They argue that we cannot alienate people that any decent person would not want to offend, including culturally radicalized college girls and dissenters who might join us if they saw us shunning the “far right.”
The problem is that the other side won’t build such a triangle. They are ruthless and amoral in their pursuit of power, and would scoff at the idea of maintaining an army of gatekeepers to keep out “extremists.” The left is never bothered by any obsession with unhygienic niceties, which allows them to very cynically impose double standards on the timid “respectable” people who blather about “common ground.”
I see a silver lining to this dark situation, and I am heartened by the young conservatives who are breaking away from this cult of kindness. Rep. Byron Donald (R-Fla.) Responded to reprimand Donald drew criticism from Trump when he failed to deny George Stephanopoulos’ suggestion that Kamala’s blackness was merely a convenient pose. Donald ignored the expected left-wing bullying and redirected the conversation to Kamala’s well-known opportunism. The clash was especially fun to watch because Donald is undeniably black and does not pass himself off as black because he has black ancestry. Trump should not have been sidetracked by Kamala’s race, but Donald was right not to give in to the angry righteous inquisitors.
Having stressed the need for an aggressive counterattack to deal with the Left and its media harem, I also want to highlight the difference between calculated attacks and lip service attacks.
When Donald, DeSantis and Vance hit back at their opponents, they choose their words carefully. They’re not just venting their anger, though some may get a different impression. Donald Trump By the way, the Republican governor of Georgia is supporting Trump in the presidential election for a crime that occurred four years ago. “madman” Or a “low IQ” opponent. These are not wise uses of firepower, but a form of complacency that does nothing to push the enemy back.
Be ruthless towards dishonest and vindictive enemies, and avoid childish attitudes.
