Here’s the State of the Day newsletter. It’s time to dive into some recent findings related to women.
__________
Hey there!
Today, I think we should explore some interesting insights about women. Have we figured out what they truly desire? That remains to be seen.
WOMEN’S STUDIES
Back in college, I enrolled in “women’s studies,” thinking I’d be surrounded by women. It was 2003, long before cultural Marxism took over things. Still, you could see early signs of those ideas emerging. The course itself? Quite a trial-and-error experience. As one of a mere handful of men in a class of 50, we were often at the receiving end of discomfort.
But hey, I needed those credits for graduation. A bit ironic that “women” counted as an “other culture,” right? Though, to be honest, I probably wasn’t in the best state of mind to reflect on that.
One of the quirkiest things about feminist narratives is how often they circle back to men. Whether it’s mimicking us, defining themselves through our actions, or engaging in discussions centered on men’s behavior, it was hard to miss.
Even women who claim independence still frame that independence in relation to men, right? Something like, “I don’t need a man!”
Initially, I was disappointed to find that my expectations of the course didn’t pan out. So, I thought, why not engage with the material? I mean, I made it a point to challenge the professor, sometimes in rather confrontational ways. Many women in the class ended up criticizing the course, citing my participation as a reason.
Believe it or not, this dynamic led to some tense moments that brought me in front of the dean. My professor even tried to get me expelled. When that failed, she sought to have me removed from the class. Eventually, she wanted me to sign something that limited my speech, which didn’t work either, as the dean upheld my First Amendment rights.
Later on, she told me she admired my assertiveness and even asked for a hug. Unbelievably, this all concluded with some somewhat awkward, lingering hugs and her, a married woman, making a rather odd advance toward me. Not exactly the experience I envisioned back then, and certainly confusing.
Fast forward 23 years, and I still find women to be a bit of a puzzle. However, that shouldn’t mean we give up on understanding them.
—
Women seem to have a peculiar attraction to certain types of men—especially those who might not be the best characters, like Luigi Mangione.
Recently, three women, dubbed the “Mangionistas,” caught media attention outside the Mangione court case. One reason was that they received official press credentials in NYC, while their comments about an individual, Brian Thompson, raised eyebrows. For instance, Ashley Rojas boldly stated that, “I don’t care if Brian Thompson died,” implying kids would be better off without him. It’s wild.
Then, Lena Weissbrot went as far as comparing his death to that of Bin Laden, arguing that it should be celebrated. Abril Rios seemed to simply nod along, looking a bit out of place.
The whole interaction was bizarre and definitely sparked a viral reaction.
What on Earth is shaping these women’s viewpoints?
—
Statistics show that 65% of degree holders are women. This has shifted university curricula and admin to reflect that reality. In media, we often refer to this as audience capture; if your audience leans heavily toward a specific demographic, the institution may take on traits of that demographic.
This is important, and I’ll circle back to this idea.
Abril Rios, who had a background in modeling, went on to receive a degree in comparative literature, which many would argue leans toward Marxist interpretations of English studies. She once aided in a campaign called “Hot Girls for Zohran.”
Weissbrot obtained a BFA from Florida State University followed by a Fulbright Scholarship centered on the intersection of hip-hop and feminism in South Africa. I can’t help but wonder: what was the reasoning behind that?
Details about Rojas are less clear, but I think you get the gist.
This encapsulates the reality of 65% of degree-holding women in our society, where we see fan clubs and merchandise dedicated to individuals like Mangione, run by people exhibiting troubling traits.
—
There’s been chatter about young men radicalizing in certain online spheres. Surprise, surprise—the narrative pushed by institutional media is often the complete opposite of the truth.
Women, including those like the Mangionistas, are actually becoming the most politically radical group.
But all hope isn’t lost.
Leaf Arbuthnot voiced concerns over the emergence of “glamorous young women on the right,” dubbing them the “Far Right’s … New Weapon.”
If you want to dive into a more nuanced analysis from my colleague, Nat Sandoval, she’s got you covered. Her take essentially indicates that what Arbuthnot labels as “Far Right” might simply be “Mid Right.” This resonates, especially since Leaf likely sits near the top of that spectrum. Of course moderates might seem extreme from that vantage point!
In my view, women generally want to be led by capable, attractive, masculine men. If the left can’t supply that (and, spoiler alert, they can’t), it’s only natural that they’ll be drawn to the right.
The most beautiful among them will be the first to move, but others are bound to follow, perhaps even Arbuthnot.
If they don’t, they risk becoming trapped in toxic behavior, mirroring figures like the Mangionistas and ultimately causing harm.
—
Lastly, I want to highlight two datasets that have gone viral recently, one reaffirming and another prompting self-reflection for men.
First, it appears that women who win the lottery are more prone to wild behavior than men.
University officials could easily interpret this as evidence that family structures are restrictive. Those with common sense might argue that, for women, families offer stability and productivity.
Men often derive purpose through resource gathering to attract mates, while women find fulfillment in nurturing relationships. It’s the connection that sustains communities. Numerous studies support this, showing that women’s happiness peaks when they balance nurturing with relying on male providers.
—
Secondly, studies around testosterone reveal intriguing dynamics. Women who were administered actual testosterone tended to engage more equitably in business situations, while those given a placebo believed to be testosterone acted more aggressively.
Naturally, many men celebrated this data, thinking it validated their own views about women’s perceptions of them.
It’s partially accurate, but let’s be clear. Testosterone influences fairness, justice, and other virtues, a notion already well-documented.
There’s this saying: “Perception is reality.” If someone observes you around a married woman frequently, it doesn’t matter whether or not anything actually happens. It’s the way it looks from an outsider’s perspective.
We need to honestly reflect if women pick up on selfish, aggressive traits from the men they see around them. Surely, it can’t all stem from university indoctrination. We must share some responsibility.
—
I genuinely believe many of the challenges facing women largely stem from men. I’ve stated this before, and I stand by it.
The absence of male strength, guidance, and influence creates chaos. We see consequences such as misguided tendencies toward hero worship for notorious criminals, leniency towards violent offenders, the elimination of advanced courses in schools due to concerns about self-esteem, and the emergence of thought policing notably in creative fields. Ultimately, this leads to a society hesitant to defend itself for fear of being labeled insensitive.
In the end, when we examine the failings perpetuated by lost women, men are essentially facing ourselves and noting our own shortcomings.
MORE LINKS
NYT Magazine Critics Respond to Online Backlash Over ‘Greatest Songwriters’ List
They missed the mark.
Scientists Revise Previous Climate Forecasts That Gained Popular Attention
Let’s make sure this isn’t sidelined.
Parents Object to College Plans to Monitor Young Children
Good for them.
