Questioning Biden’s Competence
Concerns about President Biden’s mental acuity have been raised by conservatives for quite some time—indeed, even before he officially took office. It seems, though, that mainstream outlets, like the New York Times, are starting to catch up with these sentiments.
According to Jill Savage, host of “Blaze News: The Mandate,” even the New York Times has begun to recognize the worries surrounding Biden’s legacy. She commented on a recent interview with Biden, which was just a short 10-minute phone call. “I find it somewhat impressive that he could engage for that long,” she noted.
Interestingly, there’s also news that Biden’s team, rather than Biden himself, utilized an autopen to authorize a set of controversial pardons. Over 4,200 pardons were granted during his administration, with a striking 96% issued in his last year, which included notable figures like Dr. Anthony Fauci.
“With every new batch of information released regarding these pardons, it feels like the situation only worsens,” Savage remarked.
Matthew Peterson, another host on Blaze, added that this issue is significant enough that even the New York Times needs to confront it. He pointed out that since serious legal matters are involved, it’s not something that will simply disappear.
“This indicates progress,” Savage concurred. “Now that the New York Times is going deeper into the autopen situation, we can expect this story to gain more traction.” She also mentioned a broader inertia, suggesting that even those who may have been reluctant to accept these issues can’t ignore them any longer.
Christopher Bedford, a DC correspondent for Blaze Media, offered a different perspective. He suggested that the information revealing these issues might be leaking from the White House itself. He said, “Initially, they dismiss it as a conspiracy. When that falls flat, they pivot and say it’s just old news, and therefore irrelevant.”
“Now, it seems like they’re stuck in that narrative loop,” he concluded.
