SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Democrat Takano asserts that the socialist candidate for NYC mayor advocates for capitalism

Democrat Takano asserts that the socialist candidate for NYC mayor advocates for capitalism

Takano Critiques Mamdani’s Socialism Claims

On Wednesday, Representative Mark Takano expressed that Zoran Mamdani, who identifies as a democratic socialist running for office in New York City, isn’t truly a socialist. Instead, he described him as a supporter of small “C” capitalism.

Takano shared his thoughts after attending a breakfast meeting with Mamdani and other Democratic figures in Washington, D.C. He remarked, “Overall, it seems clear to me that this guy isn’t a communist. He’s not a socialist. He’s championing small ‘C’ capitalism, really working for the small business owners in New York. It’s worth noting that half of New Yorkers find employment through small businesses.”

Takano, however, later mentioned he had “different accusations” regarding people under 40. He continued, “He stands as a democratic socialist fighting for small business people, aiming to tackle ineffective regulations, and he’s critical of Eric Adams for the sluggish pace of permitting.” He added that this fight revolves around a corruption issue hindering small capitalist entrepreneurs.

When asked if he supported Mamdani’s proposal for city-operated supermarkets, Takano seemed hesitant. He commented, “Honestly, there’s probably no significant difference between some publicly run grocery stores and cooperative ideas.” It’s a bit murky, I guess—like, how much difference does it truly make?

Meanwhile, Mamdani has often called himself a democratic socialist and, earlier in June, remarked that he had criticisms of capitalism. He has pushed back against claims labeling him a communist, yet various clips have surfaced that show him endorsing revolutionary language typically associated with communism.

One recently circulated video featured Mamdani advocating for the abolishment of private property. He stated, “If there’s a system that can secure housing for everyone—regardless of whether they label it as abolition of private property or simply a state housing guarantee—that’s surely better than our current situation.”

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News