Recently released intelligence documents have shed new, serious light on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and its ties to the Russiagate narrative—a narrative that, despite evidence, seems to persist among many Democrats.
The documents, dated back to early 2016, highlight “secret conversations” involving the Democratic National Committee and key figures from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation. It’s rather alarming.
One statement from July 25th reflects expectations that the relationship between Putin and Trump would be long-lasting. This only adds fuel to the fire the FBI was already igniting.
The evidence suggests a deeper conspiracy involving government agencies rather than just a political maneuver.
Interestingly, the campaign appeared to plan for scenarios where “promoting Putin’s support for Trump” would influence issues like voting machine security.
Moreover, the memo inferred that the FBI would eventually back a false scandal, which indeed happened under the leadership of Jim Comey and Andrew McCabe.
Clinton’s strategy was, perhaps, a diversion from the email scandal she faced while serving as Secretary of State. Even President Obama and his intelligence team elaborated on the campaign’s objectives.
This included figures like Obama, Comey, and CIA director John Brennan, who seemed to overlook the implications of the “information” that surfaced late in 2016. This led to the now-infamous Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Trump’s campaign and the Mueller inquiry that troubled the early years of Trump’s presidency.
Brennan and Comey were pivotal in developing the Steele dossier, which was essentially fabricated at the behest of Clinton’s campaign. This served as part of a broader narrative designed to paint Russia as a force working to elect Trump.
What Clinton executed might be termed a dirty trick—one that failed to secure her victory in 2016—but it complicates the legacy of Obama and his team. It feels like they truly let down the American public.
In his final days in office, President Obama perpetuated these untruths, notably suggesting to a progressive journalist that “Russia is a problem,” implying that the new administration could pursue dubious foreign relations.
A continuous stream of reports from outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post referenced unnamed “current and former intelligence officials,” contributing to a cycle of misleading narratives surrounding Trump and Russia.
Now everything is out in the open, revealing a web of lies that has been woven since the start. It raises significant questions about the integrity of those involved, particularly Obama, Brennan, and the others behind what appears to be one of the largest smear campaigns in American history. Truly shameful.
