New York Times columnist Ezra Klein has come under fire on social media following reports of his speaking fees, which range from $40,000 to $70,000. Many users reacted strongly after discovering this information on the Washington Speakers Bureau website, criticizing Klein for his high prices.
A key point of contention is that Klein often discusses themes of inequality and wealth disparity in America, making his speaking fees seem even more disproportionate, especially when they exceed the annual income of many middle-class families. One user pointed out, “You can hire Ezra Klein for a fee that’s about the typical income for a family of four. Yet, when prominent figures like Clinton or Obama charged similar amounts, the media exploded with outrage.”
Others expressed disbelief at the cost, with one social media user sarcastically noting that for a hefty sum you could benefit from Klein’s “trademark policy knowledge.” Independent journalist Glenn Greenwald labeled the fees as “patently ridiculous,” criticizing Klein for what he sees as empty rhetoric aimed at pleasing Democratic donors. Some even suggested that Klein’s primary skill revolves around promoting the interests of his contributors through his op-eds and podcasts.
The New York Post indicated that it’s not unusual for top broadcast journalists to earn $100,000 or more for speaking engagements. Within that context, Klein’s fees are right in the mid-range when compared to other industry professionals. The criticism seems to stem more from the principle of high compensation rather than a direct comparison to his peers.
Klein co-authored a children’s book titled “Abundance,” arguing that the Democratic Party has weakened itself by imposing strict regulations that stymied progress in areas like housing and infrastructure. Journalist Eugene Scott noted that the backlash against Klein’s fees is understandable, particularly given how many people earn less than $70,000 annually. However, some defended Klein, questioning why his fees surprised critics when he charges what many politicians and broadcasters do.
Author Jill Filipovic expressed confusion over the outrage, asking whether critics object to the idea of paid speaking engagements in general or merely when the speaker is someone they disagree with. In response to the controversy, a spokesperson for the Times reflected that Klein is a valuable talent who conforms to their ethical standards concerning paid speaking engagements, emphasizing that Times journalists frequently receive invitations based on their expertise.
Fox News Digital has sought comment from Klein regarding the situation.
