Fertility Treatment Mix-Up Leads to $15 Million Lawsuit
An Oregon hospital is facing a lawsuit exceeding $15 million after a woman claims she was unknowingly inseminated with the wrong sperm during fertility treatments. Her family only discovered this significant error 43 years later.
The shocking revelation emerged around 2023 when DNA testing showed that the man who had raised the woman as her father was not her biological parent. This was reported following a lawsuit that outlined the events.
The mother alleges that she was subjected to “humiliation, discomfort, and physical pain” from carrying a pregnancy that was a result of another man’s sperm. Moreover, the father lost his status as the biological parent of his first child with his wife, creating a profound emotional impact.
According to the lawsuit submitted on December 26 in Multnomah County Circuit Court, the couple, referred to as Mr. CW and Mr. KW for anonymity, underwent fertility treatments at Oregon Health & Science University in 1980. Their daughter was born on December 13, 1981.
The complaint states, “To KW and CW’s surprise, CW became pregnant and gave birth to a baby girl, AP.” The couple raised their daughter believing she was their biological child, unaware of the mix-up during the treatment.
Unfortunately, AP inherited a “medical problem” attributed to her biological father, a result of being inseminated with “foreign sperm,” as claimed in the lawsuit.
It was revealed that another man, identified as RW, who had also undergone treatment at OHSU shortly before, had his leftover sperm mistakenly used for CW and KW’s procedures, according to court documents.
The lawsuit implies that the family has been “stripped of the bonds of solidarity” that formed their lives together and will be “permanently reminded” of the circumstances surrounding their eldest daughter’s conception.
The hospital allegedly failed to observe proper storage protocols, raising concerns that KW’s sperm may have also been wrongly utilized for inseminating another patient.
Additionally, questions linger regarding whether the facility adequately tested RW’s samples, which could expose CW and AP to health risks.
The filing further accuses the hospital of trying to “conceal or deny” its mistakes, neglecting to investigate the claims properly, and failing to inform patients about the malpractice.
The mother, father, and daughter are each seeking $5 million in damages from OHSU and Providence Health, plus an additional $2 million for economic losses.
In response, OHSU stated that due to patient privacy laws and ongoing litigation, they cannot comment on the situation. Providence Health has referred comments to OHSU, stating they too do not engage on matters involving pending litigation.





