A member of the independent board overseeing Oakland’s police force, known for his anti-police stance, is again at the center of controversy following his recent promotion and allegations of legal misconduct.
On March 26, the Oakland Police Commission elevated Omar Farmer from an alternate position to a full-time member without discussing it publicly, which has triggered a formal challenge claiming it violates California’s open meetings law.
The commission intends to revote on the matter Thursday, according to Rajni Mandal, an Oakland doctor who has called for addressing what she sees as breaches of the Brown Act, the law governing public meetings in California.
Farmer has faced rejection from the Auckland City Council on two occasions regarding his desire to join committees that appoint volunteer members.
“The Police Commission needs someone who prioritizes the safety of Oakland residents,” Mandal emphasized. “We require leaders who can act impartially, free from political biases.”
Farmer is affiliated with the Anti-Police and Terrorism Project, advocating for defunding police in favor of community-based programs. This viewpoint has drawn criticism, with some arguing that the commission is disconnected from the desires of residents who seek a greater police presence.
A recent survey indicated that 92.1% of black residents in Oakland cited crime and public safety as significant concerns—the highest of any demographic.
City Councilman Ken Houston criticized Farmer’s repeated attempts to remain on the commission, likening it to a disrespectful cycle akin to an abusive relationship, as officials and public safety advocates clash despite previous rejections.
“I represent a long-standing disadvantaged community in Oakland, and my constituents are afraid; they want more police engagement,” Houston stated. “Even my daughter is hesitant to walk to the store. We seek protection like everyone else.”
City Councilman Kevin Jenkins raised alarms regarding the process too.
“These are serious matters. Oakland residents deserve to trust that all appointments related to public safety oversight are conducted lawfully and transparently,” Jenkins remarked, indicating he has reached out to the City Attorney for a review of the situation.
“This is crucial for maintaining trust in our institutions, and I will ensure they are held accountable,” he added.
The city council is set to confirm four full members and one alternate, while the mayor will appoint three full members and one alternate.
Mayor Barbara Lee has not commented on Farmer’s situation, nor has the City Attorney’s Office responded.
In a letter detailing complaints, Mandal accused Farmer of consistently surpassing his authority as outlined in the city’s charter, improperly meddling in police union negotiations, and violating meeting laws by pushing votes on items not officially on the agenda.
Mandal also raised issues regarding Farmer’s personal grievances against the Oakland Police Department during oversight discussions.
“Farmer’s history of overreach and violations of the law makes him unfit for re-election,” Mandal asserted.
Farmer did not respond to requests for comment.
