Illinois State University Employees File Lawsuit Over Hiring Practices During Strike
A union representing certain employees at Illinois State University (ISU) has initiated legal action against the institution, alleging the hiring of temporary workers while its members were on strike. This lawsuit was filed on Tuesday by AFSCME Council 31, which advocates for around 350 personnel, contending that the university’s actions breach state laws concerning employment during strikes.
The lawsuit states, “To gain leverage during the strike, the university contracted companies that employed temporary workers to cross the picket lines and perform the duties of the strikers.” Such actions are considered a Class A misdemeanor under Illinois law. The plaintiffs argue that this undermines the balance of power between the university and its employees, making it easier for the institution to manage the disruptions caused by the strike.
The legal action seeks both declaratory and injunctive relief aimed at halting the employment of these temporary replacements, claiming that without the intervention of a court, the striking employees could experience “irreparable” harm.
An ISU spokesperson remarked that the university had not yet received official notification regarding the lawsuit. They added that the university is adhering to the state’s procurement processes to ensure compliance with applicable laws.
The members of the union who are currently striking include workers responsible for building services, grounds maintenance, and dining services – roles that involve managing student residences and preparing meals in campus cafeterias. The lawsuit mentions that the university brought in five contractors, including four cleaning services, to take on the work typically done by striking employees.
Additionally, the union referred to the Strike Violator Employment Act, which forbids the intentional hiring of temporary labor to replace striking workers, stating that their concerns had previously been communicated to the university. Nevertheless, the lawsuit claims that the university continued its practices despite these warnings.
The strike commenced on April 8 after a 10-day notice to the university. Reports indicate that discussions between the parties fell short of reaching an agreement on the financial terms, particularly following the expiration of their previous contract on June 30, 2025. University representatives have stated that their final offer includes various pay increases and wages that are competitive with similar roles in the region.
