WNBA’s Media Landscape and Criticism of Players
The WNBA and much of its associated media lean politically liberal, often interpreting critiques of the league and its players—excluding Caitlin Clark—as minor attacks on women’s sports overall. It’s somewhat ironic since many believe they overlook issues that threaten the integrity and fairness of the game in favor of supporting certain policies and politicians that critics argue do the opposite.
A prime example of how criticism is sometimes exaggerated can be seen in ESPN’s Holly Rowe’s self-description as “anti-racist.” After a post of mine went viral, showcasing Angel Reese’s less-than-stellar return to the Chicago team following her trade to the Atlanta Dream, I argued that comparing her future impact to Caitlin Clark’s was quite far-fetched. Rowe even commented on social media, urging, “please stop bullying women,” directed at my message.
Angel Reese’s Performance Raises Eyebrows
Before her rebuttal in the comments, which didn’t really address the issue, I think it’s worth discussing a quote from Reese. During the rookie seasons of both Reese and Clark in 2024, Reese could be seen celebrating from the bench after a controversial play involving Clark during a game between the Chicago Sky and Indiana Fever.
Since being drafted, Reese has often been cast in a villain role, especially after taunting Clark during LSU’s national championship over Iowa. It’s as if she’s struggled to grasp why fans could be more fascinated by a player like Clark—who is widely admired for her sharpshooting—than by someone linked to less flattering nicknames for missed opportunities on the court.
People like me who critique this reality shouldn’t be labeled “bullies.” Just because I, or others, point out Reese’s play does not translate to a more extensive attack on women in sports. This misinterpretation reveals how the WNBA media tends to frame nearly any criticism of Reese since she joined the league.
Reese’s Media Representation Raises Questions
I genuinely believe no female athlete in recent history has received as much protection and promotion from mainstream sports media as Angel Reese. The league even investigated allegations of racist taunts aimed at her, which they later could not confirm. Despite impressive accomplishments, Reese’s coverage seems at odds with her actual on-court reputation, with others—like Caitlin Clark—garnering far more fan engagement.
While Reese has been portrayed as a superstar and the league’s face, many viewers—especially new fans—seem more intrigued by Clark’s games and merchandise rather than Reese’s. The disconnect in popularity appears to be widening, yet critics often argue that the media pushes audiences to overlook Reese’s shortcomings and accept her as a mainstay without question. They frame negative views as broader criticisms of women’s sports, a position some might argue is as misguided as her struggles during games.
Reflecting on Impact
In reality, despite a noteworthy college career, Reese risks being remembered more for her errors than her contributions to the WNBA. I stand by my observations, noting that she doesn’t come close to the level of influence and legacy that Caitlin Clark has established in the game.
I’m not attempting to insult; I’m just being honest. If the WNBA media wants to leverage its growing audience, there’s much more they could do with it.
