Pope Leo XIV Calls for AI Regulation and Ethical Development
On Monday, Pope Leo XIV urged for stringent regulations surrounding artificial intelligence, emphasizing that developers should prioritize the common good over profit. He unveiled a detailed manifesto aimed at safeguarding humanity amidst the growing impact of AI on various aspects of life, from employment to warfare.
Anticipation had built up for Leo’s first encyclical, titled “Magnifica humanitas” (Great Humanity), especially since his election when he highlighted AI as a pressing global challenge.
In his document, Leo criticized the prevailing “culture of power” that fuels competition in AI, particularly in the context of more advanced remote warfare techniques. He condemned the notion of allowing AI systems to make irreversible and life-ending decisions, marking a noticeable disagreement with the Trump administration’s push for AI deregulation.
Industry specialists and academics believe this encyclical will serve as a significant reference point in ongoing discussions about AI, touching on fears about job automation and diminishing human intelligence due to rapid technological progress.
“This tool is meant for those on the front lines, who experience the capabilities of AI firsthand and ponder the implications for humanity,” remarked Taylor Black, a Microsoft AI executive and director of the Institute for AI at The Catholic University of America.
Pope Confronts AI Companies During Anthropic Meeting
At a Vatican event, the Pope announced his document while engaging with the co-founders of Anthropic, a company embroiled in a legal dispute with the Trump administration regarding its AI tech. The Vatican’s initiative to connect with Anthropic reflects a longstanding effort to address the human costs associated with AI.
In his writings, Leo consistently warned against the dangerous accumulation of power and data within a select few in the private sector, particularly concerning children and vulnerable individuals, and called for tighter external regulations.
“Abstract ethics alone won’t cut it; we require robust legal frameworks, independent oversight, informed users, and political accountability,” he stated. “We cannot solely rely on a morality defined by a handful of individuals.”
Leo called on both AI developers and politicians to pause and thoughtfully consider their actions, urging them to adhere to ethical principles that favor the welfare of humanity over personal gain.
AI enterprises like OpenAI and Anthropic are now among the most valuable in the U.S., valued at hundreds of billions of dollars, exceeding the GDP of numerous nations.
Christopher Olah, an Anthropic co-founder, expressed appreciation for Leo’s critique, advocating for essential external checks on AI, especially given the significant impact of AI on labor markets.
“All sectors of society need to respond seriously to this challenge, pushing for a more positive trajectory,” Oler emphasized. “We need critics who can call out shortcomings and a moral compass that resists manipulation.”
Pope’s Text Recognized as Key Document
In his encyclical, the Pope, who has a background in mathematics, chronicled the Catholic Church’s social teachings, applying core concepts—justice, solidarity, dignity of labor, and equitable resource distribution—to the digital era.
“I believe this will be a defining document for our time,” commented Paolo Carrozza, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame. “Pope Leo is calling us to take responsibility for ensuring technology enhances, rather than diminishes, human dignity.”
The Pope’s most poignant section criticized how AI contributes to the “normalization of war,” dulling public sensitivity to its consequences. He did not specify conflicts but noted the tension between powerful nations vying for dominance.
He advocated for transparency from AI developers, insisting that the decision-making process regarding AI weapons should always be clear. The Church’s “just war” doctrine, which provides criteria for legitimate use of force, he deemed “obsolete” in light of modern warfare’s technological advancements.
Historical Context of the Encyclical
Signed on May 15, the encyclical coincided with the 135th anniversary of Pope Leo XIII’s “Rerum Novarum,” a foundational document addressing workers’ rights and the responsibilities of capitalism during the industrial era.
The current Pope believes that AI’s rise raises similar existential questions as those faced during the industrial revolution. “Magnifica humanitas” is another installment in a century-long papal tradition of applying historical social teachings to contemporary issues, often focused on labor rights for the flourishing of humanity.
The ongoing debate centers on whether AI will enrich lives or lead to widespread job loss and diminished intelligence, stirring a mix of fear and idealistic visions.
“The quest for the greater good can’t justify sacrificing jobs systemically. Humans should never merely be means to an end; the economy must prioritize human dignity,” Leo asserted.
He also acknowledged the importance of maintaining human dignity in the workplace and issued a historic apology for the Church’s historical role in endorsing slavery through its support of colonial powers.
A Decade of Engagement with Technology Companies
While specifics about contributors to Leo’s encyclical remain undisclosed, the Vatican has engaged in discussions with tech companies for the past ten years, with Pope Francis increasingly addressing AI’s potential risks toward the end of his papacy.
The Pope’s decision to include Anthropic at the Vatican event faced criticism from those who interpreted it as endorsing AI companies.
In February, following Anthropic’s refusal to permit unrestricted military use of its technology, the Trump administration ordered all federal agencies to cease utilizing AI from the company. Anthropic argues it focuses on safety and risk management in its efforts and is currently pursuing legal action against the administration.
Brian Boyd, of the nonprofit Future of Life Institute, viewed Oller’s participation as recognition of the significant influence these companies wield rather than outright endorsement.
“This highlights the reality that powerful companies are vying to replace human workers,” Boyd noted, acknowledging Anthropic’s responsibility and commitment to open dialogue in the industry.


