“You need a chevron, and I need a chevron.”
That’s the unusual stance from Xavier Becerra, a prominent Democratic candidate for governor in California. He’s stepping away from the usual leftist stance with one of the state’s boldest climate initiatives. Notably, he hasn’t fully backed the plan to eliminate the sales of new gas-powered cars by 2035.
Leading the polls as the primary election on June 2 approaches, Becerra, who previously served as the Health and Human Services secretary, is cautious about endorsing California’s aim to ban the sale of gasoline-powered and hybrid vehicles starting in 2035.
“California should move away from gasoline vehicles where it makes sense, and where both infrastructure and affordability for families are guaranteed,” he stated during a recent interview.
His remarks reflect a more moderate viewpoint on climate policy, particularly as financial issues grow more prominent in California’s political discussions.
Becerra elaborated further, noting that the state’s shift from fossil fuels hinges on various unpredictable elements, such as federal support, automaker cooperation, and California’s financial condition.
“We’re not going to live in a world of chicanery,” he said. “If someone claims they have the answers, they’re probably just making exaggerated promises.”
His perspective diverges significantly from Governor Newsom’s policies, especially against a 2020 mandate that pushed for stricter emissions standards and rapid movement toward electric vehicles.
Andrew Acosta, a Democratic consultant, commented, “Becerra seems to be taking a more lenient stance regarding affordability. If we phase out gas-powered vehicles, many people won’t be able to afford electric options right away.”
While Newsom has rolled back some climate goals, he has consistently backed the 2035 initiative and reaffirmed the state’s commitment to electric vehicles, especially after the Trump administration eliminated the $7,500 federal tax credit.
“We won’t let illegal actions undermine our sensible policies aimed at cleaning the air and protecting public health,” Newsom argued.
Becerra’s stance has opened him up to attacks from his Democratic opponent, billionaire climate advocate Tom Steyer, who has dubbed him “Big Oil Becerra” and questioned his acceptance of donations from the oil sector.
Steyer’s spokesperson claimed, “Tom is dedicated to ambitious climate goals and will strive to overcome obstacles to meet the 2035 targets,” contrasting Becerra’s approach.
On the other hand, Becerra’s position has raised alarms among advocates for clean transport. They warn that backing away from the state’s EV objectives could lead to increased pollution and tarnish California’s reputation as a climate leader.
Dan Sperling, a director at the Transportation Research Institute at UC Davis, expressed his disappointment in Becerra’s comments. “It’s perplexing and disappointing,” he remarked.
Some observers think Becerra’s concerns underscore the real challenges that await the next governor.
“Goals are essential, but they don’t just happen without effort,” stated Caitlin Rodner Sutter, California director for the Environmental Defense Fund. “This is just the beginning; what follows requires significant fundraising, policymaking, and coalition-building, regardless of who takes office.”
