Hello, readers.
Let’s dive in.
The truth behind Scott Pelley’s CBS fallout
I can’t help but picture him getting riled up, but really, Scott Pelley likely delivered his lines with some authority.
“She’s ruining 60 Minutes,” Perry remarked about Bari Weiss, the new head of the team. Apparently, she was brought in with the intention to dismantle the show, and, well, it seems she’s doing just that. She doesn’t deserve the role,” he said.
This was more of an informal comment made to one of his recent superiors, Nick Bilton, the executive producer Weiss hired for revising 60 Minutes.
“You’re ideal for this role. The shifts she’s implemented at the Evening News have been disastrous. So, why expect improvement here?”
This seems to be a recurring situation for Pelley. But, it raises questions: what really counts as valid critique? What truly matters is who’s in charge and who’s not.
If you’re curious about whether this burst of frustration was leaked intentionally, consider this: the Post had both a recording of the dialogue and testimonies from multiple sources present to back it up.
In other words, the story was neatly packaged and handed off to WaPo.
The episode concluded with Bilton exiting and the whole crew giving Perry a standing ovation. It turns out that reality can be even more dramatic than memes.
—
Just a couple of months post-Trump’s emergency declaration in March 2020, Perry found himself interviewing Peter Daszak on “60 Minutes.”
For those unaware, 60 Minutes is considered the gold standard in broadcast journalism. It’s akin to combining the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. What stories they choose to highlight—and how—can influence the national conversation.
This is why it airs on Sunday nights; there’s an almost pretentious belief that what they cover will ignite discussions nationwide come Monday morning.
For quite a while, this has held true. 60 Minutes has shaped the weekly media cycle and dictated what’s significant versus what’s not. More subtly, it also set the tone for how stories are approached.
Things were fine for a time, until Perry interviewed Daszak. Ironically, it was a year after Perry released his memoir, entitled “The Truth Worth Telling.”
The irony here is rather pointed—it suggests not every truth is worth sharing. So, who gets to decide?
Perry, during the interview with Daszak, probably skimmed through publicly available documents for about an hour. He should have been aware that Daszak’s organization, EcoHealth Alliance, received substantial funding for research related to “gain of function” experiments, which had been banned due to safety concerns.
(Studies indicated such experiments could potentially lead to catastrophic outcomes.)
Another public record showed that EcoHealth allocated taxpayer money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for research mirroring the aforementioned experiments. Documents revealed WIV’s plans to create similar viruses aimed at developing cures or vaccines, but this was never widely reported.
Moreover, it came to light that Daszak co-authored an op-ed in The Lancet defending WIV while branding the lab-leak theory as mere conspiracy.
Considering this messy backdrop, a reporter, especially one familiar with Perry’s connections, might hesitate to challenge Daszak.
But Perry, instead, pointedly asked Daszak about the potential lab origin of the virus—a question to which Daszak had already responded, conveniently omitting his financial interests. Unsurprisingly, Daszak repeated his statements, and Perry lost faith in his scientific credibility.
Ultimately, Daszak can’t escape consequences. He’s currently out of a job and facing financial strains. EcoHealth is barred from accepting government grants, and that so-called “conspiracy theory” that he dismissed is increasingly considered accurate.
However, the crux of the issue isn’t necessarily that 60 Minutes got it wrong. It’s that their framing of what constitutes a legitimate inquiry impeded a thorough investigation of all aspects, giving China and parties involved time to tidy up their mess.
—
This failure isn’t isolated.
Months later, Leslie Stahl confronted Trump and asserted that Hunter Biden’s laptop “could not be verified.” Despite her hefty salary, the email in question was still detectable on Google’s servers shortly afterward.
Meanwhile, 60 Minutes was airing segments on school closures due to COVID-19, relying on the expertise of various officials—many of whom possessed obvious conflicts of interest.
By then, we had already learned, from extensive state and federal data tracking, that the fatality rate for the under-18 demographic was between 0.01 and 0.03%. In simpler terms, this means it’s less deadly than the flu.
Students are still struggling to catch up from the disruptions in their learning.
—
Labeling 2020’s 60 Minutes as a catastrophic failure feels like a gross understatement. The show influenced the content and methodologies of three critical reports during that year, leading to significant negative impacts on everyday Americans.
Yet, it seems some politicians and those in prestigious journalism benefited.
—
It’s possible that Perry’s dramatic outburst was a strategic move to step back from his role and perhaps kickstart a Substack or podcast, garnering attention amid a controversy that could boost his audience.
Yes, it’s undeniably ironic.
Still, underneath all this, there’s a palpable anxiety.
If we peel back these lofty ideas and a layer of elitism, a somewhat consistent mindset can be uncovered.
Perry seems to sense the shifting landscape—his field is losing its stronghold over narratives as new voices with different motives start to emerge. He’s probably popular among old-school figures who are now grappling with their diminishing influence over what’s deemed legitimate.
Perry might maintain a composed exterior, but it’s likely there’s a lot of internal chaos.
Other notes
Jill Biden acknowledges doctor attended to Joe post-heated argument
Speaking of media with strong biases…
Democratic women rally to voice frustrations over painful menstrual cramps
…
Luke: The Austin Metcalfe trial won’t be televised due to the defense’s unpleasantness.
Luke’s thoughtful perspectives are back again.
