Supreme Court convenes to hear President Trump’s eligibility case
The Supreme Court has assembled and is expected to begin hearing arguments from both sides of the case soon. donald trump His involvement in the January 6th riot makes him eligible to run for president.
as Steve VladekA University of Texas law professor points out that the court will not begin hearing the case immediately.
One listening note: #scotus:
The court *convenes* at 10:00 ET, but there is other business to do before the Article III argument, including filing one or more opinions in *other* cases. , live streaming *doesn’t happen.
So the actual live feed won’t start for a while…
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) February 8, 2024
“}}” config=”{“renderingTarget”:”Web”,”darkModeAvailable”:false}”>
One listening note: #scotus:
The court *convenes* at 10:00 ET, but there is other business to do before the Article III argument, including filing one or more opinions in *other* cases. , live streaming *doesn’t happen.
So the actual live feed won’t start for a while…
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) February 8, 2024
Nor are the nine justices scheduled to announce their decision today. That will likely happen at some point in the future.
“,”elementId”:”7a5b3ca7-ad4e-4346-aa4e-bd1ea036361b”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
As Steve Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas, notes, the court won’t begin hearing the case immediately:
“,”elementId”:”80af38ce-e74e-42b7-83b9-1017fbf0e035″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TweetBlockElement”,”source”:”Twitter”,”id”:”1755602454945862028″,”elementId”:”d7261075-7bb6-4f5d-a3c4-e695b57849d6″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”url”:”https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status/1755602454945862028″,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”html”:”
One listening note re: #SCOTUS:
The Court is *convening* at 10 ET, but it has other business to conduct before the Section 3 argument—including handing down one or more opinions in *other* cases—that will *not* be live-streamed.
So the actual live feed won’t start for a bit…— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) February 8, 2024
“},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Nor are the nine justices expected to announce their decision today. That is likely to come at some point in the future.
“,”elementId”:”96220c42-0615-40f3-bcbe-abc77d1384ce”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:true,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1707404102000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”09.55 EST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1707405078000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”: “10.11 EST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1707404404000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”10.00 EST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”10.00″,”title”:”Supreme Court convenes to hear President Trump’s eligibility case”, “contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Thursday, February 8, 2024 10:40 AM EST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Thursday, February 8, 2024, 08:56 AM EST”},{“id”:”65c4dfd68f08b8fa87cc84a8 “,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
From the Guardian’s Cameron Joseph, here’s a primer of what to watch for as the supreme court hears arguments today over whether or not Donald Trump is eligible to run for president, because of his involvement in the January 6 insurrection.
“,”elementId”:”c4ebf1c9-78ea-4091-a295-d2443f08702a”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The case is one of the most politically charged the court has ever faced, and there’s plenty of speculation over how the body, which is dominated by its six-justice conservative majority, will rule:
“,”elementId”:”b0ab7830-3283-4e10-a335-78d9e213a393″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
\n
The US supreme court meets today to hear oral arguments on whether the 14th amendment of the constitution bars the former president Donald Trump from appearing on the ballot in Colorado and other states because of his role in the January 6 Capitol riot. The case is unprecedented: the clause has rarely been used since it became part of the constitution after the civil war in 1868, and it has never before been applied to a former president.
\n
The oral arguments are expected to be something of a free-for-all, with nine justices asking about a bevy of unresolved constitutional issues. And the justices’ questions on Thursday could hint at exactly how they might rule.
\n
What they have been asked to decide is whether Trump should not be allowed to run for president because of section three of the 14th amendment, which says no one who has taken an oath to support the constitution – typically administered when elected officials are sworn into office – and goes on to engage “in insurrection or rebellion” against the US, is allowed to hold public office again.
\n
Many legal scholars and former government officials have made the case in briefs that the plain language of the amendment applies to Trump, but few expect the supreme court to, in effect, decide the 2024 election by disqualifying one of the main candidates. Court watchers suspect that they would rather not hear the case at all – and may seek to make as narrow a ruling as possible.
\n
“,”elementId”:”d6f7a6a0-c0a8-4d7b-b96e-4e0ea5f44bc8″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.RichLinkBlockElement”,”prefix”:”Related: “,”text”:”What to watch for at US supreme court oral arguments on keeping Trump off 2024 ballot”,”elementId”:”7645d9e1-458c-4496-94e5-5a2b530632a2″,”role”:”thumbnail”,”url”:”https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/08/trump-us-supreme-court-14th-amendment”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1707401174000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”09.06 EST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1707401507000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”: “09.11 EST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1707401508000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”09.11 EST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”09.11″,”title”:”Watch as Supreme Court considers whether Trump is eligible to run To do”,”Contributor”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Thursday, February 8, 2024 10:40 AM EST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Thursday, February 8, 2024, 08:56 AM EST”},{“id”:”65c4d5008f08b8fa87cc83af “,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Good morning, US politics blog readers. Beginning at 10am ET today, the supreme court will hear arguments in a case that could decide if Donald Trump is eligible to continue his run for president. A legal effort to keep the former president off ballots nationwide began last year, when advocacy groups filed lawsuits in various states, arguing the constitution bars Trump from serving because he engaged in an insurrection on January 6. State officials and judges in lower courts have come to different conclusions on the merits of these claims, but the most notable decision was rendered by the Colorado supreme court, which agreed with the plaintiffs and threw him off the state’s ballot. Trump appealed that ruling, and the nine justice of the nation’s highest court will consider the issue today.
“,”elementId”:”678aeab2-500b-4fbe-b67f-dde05496a09d”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The supreme court is dominated by its six-member conservative supermajority, three of whom Trump appointed. Today’s arguments will give a hint of how they’re thinking about an issue that legal scholars view as the most contentious political issue the court has waded into since Bush v Gore in 2000, the case that proved decisive in George W Bush winning that year’s presidential election. We’ll cover the arguments live here, and let you know how it’s looking.
“,”elementId”:”e7081bec-5c5b-46e4-ba98-8ea4e92f5942″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Here’s what else is happening:
“,”elementId”:”d1f600b8-e552-4e6d-ad55-c41097bb84fd”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
- \n
-
Haggling continues in Congress over passing legislation to provide Ukraine and Israel with military assistance. The ball is now in the Senate’s court, where Democrats are attempting to pass legislation to do that, but it is still unclear if Republicans will sign on.
-
Robert Hur, the special counsel appointed to investigate if Joe Biden mishandle classified documents, told attorney general Merrick Garland that he has completed his investigation, the Associated Press reports.
-
Marianne Williamson, a long-shot Democratic candidate, has dropped out of the race for president.
\n
\n
\n
“,”elementId”:”e6c54544-3fb4-412e-983d-2d57e8c2098b”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1707400579000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”08.56 EST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1707399293000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”: “08.34 EST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1707400579000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”08.56 EST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”08.56″,”title”:”Supreme Court could bar Trump from office until January 6 “Contributor”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Thursday, February 8, 2024 10:40 AM EST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”Initial publication date Thursday, February 8, 2024, 08:56 AM EST”}],”filterKeyEvents”:false, “id”:”key-events-carousel-mobile “}” config=”{“renderingTarget”:”Web”,”darkModeAvailable”:false}”>
important events
The justices took turns fielding questions about Jonathan Mitchell, the former Texas attorney general who represents Donald Trump.
After a long period of silence, conservative justice begins to move. Brett Kavanaugh I just asked the first question.I haven’t heard anything yet from his fellow conservatives. Neil Gorsuch. All of the other judges had a chance to spar with Mitchell.
Plaintiffs seeking to keep Donald Trump from voting for president state: Section 3 of the 14th AmendmentIt would remove anyone from federal elected office who takes an oath to uphold the Constitution and “participates in rebellion or insurrection.”
The question is whether this provision is self-executing, meaning whether Congress must pass a law to enforce it.trump lawyer Jonathan Mitchell Asked by a conservative justice activist clarence thomas If section 3 autoruns and responds with:
States have no role in enforcing Article III unless Congress enacts a law giving them that power.
When the Supreme Court begins hearing the case, Donald Trump’s lawyer Jonathan Mitchell will be the first to take the stand.
“The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision is wrong and should be reversed for a number of independent reasons,” Mitchell said.
By a 4-3 vote, the Colorado Supreme Court removed Trump from the state’s presidential ballot, ruling that the former president is appealing.
The U.S. Supreme Court could decide this case in a variety of ways, but it could issue a broad ruling that addresses questions of President Trump’s eligibility in the various states at issue.
Supreme Court convenes to hear President Trump’s eligibility case
The Supreme Court has assembled and is expected to begin hearing arguments from both sides of the case soon. donald trump His involvement in the January 6th riot makes him eligible to run for president.
as Steve VladekA University of Texas law professor points out that the court will not begin hearing the case immediately.
One listening note: #scotus:
The court *convenes* at 10:00 ET, but there is other business to do before the Article III argument, including filing one or more opinions in *other* cases. , live streaming *doesn’t happen.
So the actual live feed won’t start for a while…
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) February 8, 2024
“}}” config=”{“renderingTarget”:”Web”,”darkModeAvailable”:false}”>
One listening note: #scotus:
The court *convenes* at 10:00 ET, but there is other business to do before the Article III argument, including filing one or more opinions in *other* cases. , live streaming *doesn’t happen.
So the actual live feed won’t start for a while…
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) February 8, 2024
Nor are the nine justices scheduled to announce their decision today. That will likely happen at some point in the future.
hugo lowell
I was at the Supreme Court for today’s hearing and noticed Jason Miller, a close aide to President Donald Trump, entering the building.
The former president has attended some court hearings, including a defamation lawsuit brought against him by a writer. E. Jean Carrolland he is not scheduled to be here today for his arraignment on the state and federal charges brought against him.
The Supreme Court is not the only court considering Donald Trump’s fate.
The question they are considering is constitutional, but the former president faces dozens of criminal charges spread across four indictments, as well as several civil lawsuits.
We have a newsletter covering the latest information on all these cases. You can register below.
Points to watch when the Supreme Court considers Trump’s eligibility to run
Here’s a primer on what to watch for when the Supreme Court hears arguments today from the Guardian’s Cameron Joseph. donald trump Because of his involvement in the January 6th insurrection, he is eligible to run for president.
The case is one of the most politically charged the court has ever faced, and there has been much speculation about how the court, which has a majority of six conservative justices, will rule. be.
The U.S. Supreme Court will meet today to hear oral arguments on whether the 14th Amendment bars former presidents donald trump He could not appear on the ballot in Colorado or other states because of his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. The case is unprecedented, as the clause has rarely been used or applied to former presidents since it became part of the Constitution after the 1868 Civil War.
Oral arguments are expected to be held in a free-form format, with the nine justices asking questions on a number of unresolved constitutional issues. And the justices’ questions Thursday could hint at exactly how they will govern.
What they are being asked to decide is whether Trump should be allowed to run for president, citing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. The constitutional amendment stipulates that no one is sworn to uphold the Constitution and is typically implemented when elected officials take office. – and be allowed to hold public office again if they continue to participate in “insurrection or insurrection” against the United States.
Although many legal scholars and former government officials have argued in briefs that the amendment’s plain language applies to President Trump, the Supreme Court effectively disqualifies one of the leading nominees. Few expect it to decide the 2024 election. I suspect that court observers would rather not hear the case at all, and may be seeking to issue a verdict as narrowly as possible.
Supreme Court to consider case that could bar Trump from office until January 6th
Good morning, readers of the US Politics Blog. Starting today at 10 a.m. ET, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in a case that could decide: donald trump He is eligible to continue running for president. Legal efforts across the country to prevent the former president from voting began last year, when the Constitution barred Trump from holding office because of the January 6 insurrection. Advocacy groups have filed lawsuits in various states over the issue. While there were varying conclusions on the merits of these claims, the most notable decision was handed down by the Colorado Supreme Court, which agreed with the plaintiff and removed him from the state’s ballot. Mr. Trump has appealed the ruling, and nine justices on the nation’s highest court are scheduled to consider the issue today.
The Supreme Court is controlled by a six-member conservative supermajority, three of whom were appointed by Trump. Today’s arguments offer a hint at how they think about what legal scholars consider to be the most contentious political issue the court has tackled since Bush v. Gore in 2000. will give. This issue was an incident that provided decisive evidence. George W. Bush He won the presidential election that year. We’ll be covering the discussion live here and letting you know how it goes.
Here’s what else is going on:
-
haggling Congress continues to debate a bill to provide military aid to Ukraine and Israel. The ball is now in the Senate, where Democrats are aiming to pass legislation to do so, but it remains unclear whether Republicans will sign it.
-
Robert Herra special prosecutor appointed to investigate joe biden Mishandling of confidential documents, Said attorney general merrick garland He has completed his investigation, the Associated Press reported.
-
Marianne WilliamsonHe was a leading candidate for the Democratic Party, but withdrew from the presidential campaign.
