SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Politico Reporter Apologizes for Comments About ‘Christian Nationalists’

Politico reporter Heidi Przybyla wrote an article Thursday apologizing for comments that labeled people who believe their rights are God-given as “extremists” and “Christian nationalists.”

Pusibrya’s article is published Major Christian groups sent a letter to Politico’s leadership on Wednesday demanding an apology and accusing it of displaying “a disqualifying lack of knowledge of the founding documents of the United States and an extremely biased view of America’s religious communities.” .

“Some clumsy words caused some people to interpret my statement as making a completely different statement than I believe,” Przybyla wrote. “Excerpts of my remarks were widely publicized in some political circles by some activists, but their main objection was not to my television appearances but to the tactics of political activists who subscribed to the philosophy they called I believe it was my reporting in Politico about the topic of Christian nationalism. ” Christianity is a religion. Christian nationalism is a political movement. As I said on air, there is a big difference between the two. ”

She continued:

Reporters have a responsibility to use words to convey the meaning accurately, and I regret that I was unable to do so because of my appearance. To be clear, the above is not a good definition of Christian nationalism. Many people hold views about our rights as Americans that align with the views of many of the Founders. In my full statement, I noted that many other individuals and groups from all sides of the political equation, including the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., who cited this concept in his fight for civil rights, He pointed out that he was quoting natural law. But, of course, the question of which policies, rights, and values ​​ascribe to natural law is in the eye of the beholder.

She went on to claim that she has no “religious prejudice.”

“Those who complain must recognize that in a pluralistic society, those on the other side of the policy debate may have religious or idealistic beliefs that are just as sincere as theirs. No,” she wrote. “Neither side should claim to have unique insight that represents the will of God or that the other is opposed to that will.”

Take a look — Przybyla of Politico: Christian nationalists, not Christians, believe rights come from God.

On February 23, Przybyla said on MSNBC’s All In that Christian nationalists, not Christians, believe that rights come from God, which translates Christian values ​​into a “disruption to democracy.” This appears to be part of an ongoing movement on the left to portray the country as a “threat.”
Przybyla said:

The foundations of the Republican Party have changed. Remember when Trump ran for office in 2016? Many mainland evangelicals wanted nothing to do with a divorced real estate mogul who cheated on his wife with a porn star. What happened there was that he was surrounded by more radical elements. We will hear terms like “Christian nationalism” and “new apostolic reformation.” These groups have a lot of power around Trump and they need to be well educated because they are the only thing that unites them all because there are different groups around Trump. What unites them as Christian nationalists is not, by the way, that Christian nationalists are very different because as Americans, as all human beings, our rights come from an earthly authority. The point is that I believe that it is not a thing. They don’t come from Congress. They don’t come from the Supreme Court. They come from God.

The problem is that they are deciding what God is telling them. Human, that’s human. In the past, so-called natural law has been a pillar of Catholicism and has been used for good, for example in social justice movements. Martin Luther King Jr. invoked it when speaking about civil rights.

But now there are conservative Christian extremists who argue that this applies especially to issues including abortion and same-sex marriage. And as you can see, for example, in this week’s Alabama decision, the justices said: Dominionists talk about surrogacy, in vitro fertilization, sex education in schools, and many other issues. There are many others.

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, and Brian Birch, president of Catholic Vote, condemned Przybyla’s comments in a letter to the organization. politikocalling them “deeply alarming.”

It stated:

As a national investigative correspondent politiko, Mr. Przybyla is committed to accurately reporting on America’s government, politics and law. It is therefore deeply disturbing that she appears to be unaware of the opening lines of the Declaration of Independence and its references to “the laws of nature and the God of nature.”

Equally concerning is the denigration of the Christian faith reflected in Przybyla’s comments. Her statements seek to spread misinformation about Christians by creating the perception that Christians have unique beliefs that pose a distinct, in her words, “extremist” threat to our country. It was an attempt.

He added: “Aside from the inaccuracy of her comments, she was clearly trying to demonize the Christian community and instill fear through propaganda.”

Perkins responded to Przybyla’s apology for X, calling for a “do-over.”

“If this is Ms. Przybyla’s apology for defaming Bible-believing Christians who exercised their right as Americans to participate in the political process, she needs to start over,” Perkins wrote. “Her words on MSNBC were calculated and not ‘awkward.’ Politico needs to confess their religious hostility. ”

Katherine Hamilton is a political reporter for Breitbart News. You can follow her at @thekat_Hamilton.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News