We are rapidly approaching the most important primary election of our lives. Sure, the presidential primaries we’ve all been sleeping on may be over, but most states still haven’t had primaries for state and federal positions on the ballot. Will the unprecedented betrayal of the past few months finally be the catalyst for change among Republican voters and activists? Or will we continue to reflexively nominate every sitting politician and most famous politician with an “R” next to their name, perpetuating dystopian one-party rule?
In reality, despite the shocking betrayal, not a single House or Senate Republican lost this year’s primaries. If we don’t step up our game, the bad guys will get shut out.
Thanks to the national Freedom Caucus, we now have an established brand to challenge the Unionist Party across the country.
To date, primaries have been held in nine of the 50 states, including Texas. Dozens of Republicans who voted for the Ukraine funding and omnibus bill set sail for renomination before our eyes. Even the few who voted properly are likely to return to their original disposition once they secure the nomination. Some of our worst senators, like Roger Wicker of Mississippi, won Donald Trump’s support even though he opposed us on every major issue.
What we’re doing isn’t working.
Unfortunately, President Trump supports RINOs.
Since the days of the Tea Party, we have slept through primaries, reveling in one man’s personality, as if that one man would fix all the party’s mistakes. Sadly, President Trump has come full circle. He has supported nearly every lukewarm Republican incumbent over the four election cycles he has dominated the party. He only objects if the RINO disrespects him personally. The upstart Republicans are getting smarter, learning how to co-opt the men at the top while rejecting the values of their base.
This has created a dynamic where Republicans in the Chamber of Commerce, which we were beginning to lose during the Tea Party era, are now safer than ever. Few of the conservative rising stars in state legislatures are challenging sitting House members or senators, knowing that Mr. Trump is likely to pull the rug out from under them. This is why Trump hasn’t been able to drain the Republican swamp since he took over the Republican Party in 2016.
A whopping 24 of the 31 Republican senators who voted on the Ukraine issue have been endorsed by President Trump at some point over the past six years, not only during the general election but also in the primaries. Two of them, Mr. Wicker and Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, are up for re-election this year, but despite their globalist voting records on nearly every important issue, they were voted against President Trump early on. was supported by.
It doesn’t have to be this way.
We learned from the Texas congressional primary that when President Trump and party leaders come together on principle, they can quickly reap the rewards. More than a dozen incumbents, including state House Speaker Dade Phelan, were defeated or faced runoff elections. Imagine what would happen if President Trump endorsed an incumbent representative from another state.
Build benches in the state
Thanks to the national Freedom Caucus, we now have an established brand to challenge the Unionist Party across the country. These are the most important elections of our lifetimes. Because when the federal system becomes even more tenable than it is now, especially if Biden is re-elected, it will determine whether there will be options for truly red states seeking refuge.
In Wyoming, for example, 13 RINOs are being challenged in the House and several others in the Senate. In Idaho, another state with a liberal Republican governor, the Freedom Caucus has challengers to 19 incumbent House members and seven senators who are supporters of Gov. Brad Little.
If the Freedom Caucus succeeds in these states, it will win majorities in some chambers and become the last thing standing between us and a complete dystopia. In that sense, red state primaries are insurance against the federal government’s bad intentions.
The importance of the Freedom Caucus’s parliamentary elections will continue to resonate over the years as it builds benches of candidates to run for high office.
It’s already happening. In Missouri, state Sen. Bill Eigel is running for governor and Denny Hoskins is running for secretary of state. Both men were expelled from the committee by the leadership for forcing a vote on a bill that the United Party disliked. State Rep. Bob Onder, a member of the Missouri House Freedom Caucus, is scheduled to run against incumbent Rep. Blaine Lutkemeyer in the Show Me state’s 3rd Congressional District.
The South Carolina Freedom Caucus has decided on challengers to 33 incumbents in the June 11 primary and is fielding many of its existing stars. State Rep. Adam Morgan is challenging William Timmons in the Spartanburg-based 4th Congressional District. President Trump has endorsed Timmons, but Morgan may be his only chance to defeat the incumbent this year. Fellow Freedom Caucus warrior Stewart Jones is running in another open seat in the state’s north.
In 2026, the South Carolina Freedom Caucus will have influence in endorsing the next gubernatorial candidate. But that would require the right to pressure Trump not to support potential governor Tim Scott. We also need to dissuade people from supporting Lindsey Graham’s re-election.
These are just some of the issues at stake in the upcoming Congressional primaries. Several red seats are open, and disloyal incumbents are also running for renomination. Our future success every day during the election period depends on these primaries in which we too often fall asleep during the process.
We need to make it clear early on that we will not support candidates who do not commit to joining the Freedom Caucus, and finally break this cycle of blindly selecting the first big-name Republican that appears on the ballot. be. Of course, his 90% of big name companies are the biggest problem makers acquired by the industry.
Much of what happens in a presidential election is out of our control. But it is clearly within our power to influence primaries in the remaining red states. If we continue to nominate these clowns, it will not be the result of phantom voter fraud in red states (as opposed to blue states). If this time next year we’re stuck with the same single-party Republicans, it will all be the result of laziness beyond our control.
